• GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not particularly, but it’s important progress for a country with essentially zero inter-city trains running.

      Such a pity too, the shape of the country just really seems to make so much sense for trains - just run a big north-south line and connect basically everything anyone would care about.

      • Speed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US is a poor standard for high speed rail, or even trains in general. A better comparison would be with France, where trains can go up to 320kmph.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Something also built by china might be a good comparison. The new high speed trains in Indonesia (also built by china) regularly go up to 350 kmph.

          • hangukdise@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Building high quality rail networks requires legal framework to facilitate that given that initial costs are staggering. The US framework simply leaves everything to private initiative and given the multitude of local land regulation and lack of laws to support strategic mobilization at this scale, it is guaranteed the USA will never have a country-wide high speed rail network. There are just too many interests to satisfy in a very diverse legal landscape across cities, counties, and states.