You must log in or register to comment.
There might be an important point in there, but suggesting that 500 companies are failing, when they’re obviously very successful at what they’re trying to do, is giving them both too much and too little credit.
Not fond of the headline in other words.
Edit - it also sidesteps the root of the issue: the social and economic system that is driving the ongoing destruction of our ecosystem.
They’re not failing. They’re actively choosing not to.
The problem with these lists, is that when the top contributor denies working to reduce their impact, the response is never a call to destroy them.
They are destroyers.
They need compounding fines charged to them every time they continue on this path.