• Mantis_Toboggan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuckerberg should just send that Muskrat a poop emoji.

    We should just start inciting for them to have a no-holds-bar, hell-in-a-cell, ladder, hardcore cage fight to the death. Then, when its over, we just don’t open the cage.

    • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s ok, it’ll take Mark a few hours to unhinge his jaw and swallow Elon’s corpse whole. Then he’s gunna find a nice warm rock to lay on and digest.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we should start putting our money where our mouths are and start eating these people and their businesses

      • Mantis_Toboggan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can stay in their habitats; no need to bring in wildlife.

        If they’ve grown up in captivity, we can just do an intermission where someone throws a cardboard box in their enclosures and livestream it. It’ll be a hit!

  • JakenVeina@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Over the past year, Meta has hired dozens of Twitter employees

    LOL, you mean all those employees you unceremoniously fired?

      • shawnj2@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Noncompetes are basically unenforceable in California, you can make people sign them but they’re about as useful as if they were made out of toilet paper

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        IANAL, but from what I understand, you can put anything you want in a contract, but it doesn’t mean it’s enforceable.

        So the reason why companies put in non-compete clauses is mostly because people believe it, not because it’s really enforceable.

        Now if former twitter employees were still getting severance from Twitter while working at Meta, that could be an issue. But generally speaking, if you’re not getting money (consideration) non-compete clauses don’t matter much.

        • notatoad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          In most regions, you’re right: you can put a noncompete in a contract, but enforcing it is another matter.

          But noncompete clauses are explicitly illegal in California, where Twitter is based.

        • Stan@lemmywinks.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most severance is paid in a lump sum.

          And if they laid you off or fired you, there’s no way they can enforce a no compete clause.

      • Jallrich@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that it is also different if you get fired. Don’t know in detail, but I assume that if they fire you without a valid cause they don’t have any grounds to complain that you did a sensitive and unique work.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good ol’ fash brain rot. The idols are simultaneously genius who master plan everything like 5D chess, and poor victims who are marginalized and constantly being bullied by the big bad woke.

      • Smallletter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I personally don’t, the difference between this and that is that most people here, together as a community, have decided, again together, that they don’t want to federate with Meta apps because of a long history of privacy and other abuses.

        That’s not the same thing as another billionaire pissed off because they are doing exactly what capitalism is “supposed to do”

        Do better or die is the whole philosophy no?

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh boy, everyone should tell those Indian slaves in Dubai. They can’t hold you prisoner guys, it’s not valid if it’s not voluntary, so you can just go home. The capitalists say it’s okay…wait, what? Oh! it was the capitalists who put them there.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  An innocent person who commits a crime is no longer an innocent person.

                  A vegetarian who starts eating meat is no longer a vegetarian.

                  A capitalist who enslaves someone is no longer a capitalist.

                  I’m so sorry you have trouble with this basic definition, but capitalism is a free market system. Slaves are not free, and that economic relationship is not a free market relationship.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  From wikipedia:

                  Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.[1][2][3][4] Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, price systems, private property, property rights recognition, voluntary exchange, and wage labor.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t see the conflict?

          Here it’s a case of hypocrisy, as it’s a conflict between berating someone else for some behavior, and engaging in it ourselves.

          • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re making a false equivalence. Musk is scared about losing more of his money. People here seemingly don’t like Meta and don’t want it to infest lemmy. Those aren’t even close to being the same.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Or, Musk’s actions could be in line with protecting free speech. I mean, that’s the fear we have of Meta here: that it will destroy this space and silence voices.

              So if (a) Musk claims he’s protecting free speech, and then (b) takes actions consistent with that view, then there’s no opening to make an argument of the form “Must claims X but does Y”, when Y could be interpreted as a manifestation of goal X.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well what I said was:

                  • Musk claimed to be working to protect free speech
                  • Musk’s actions are consistent with that goal
                  • If fighting Meta isn’t consistent with that goal, then why are we fighting Meta?
              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I thought the law suit was centered around the fact that Twitter shit canned a bunch of programmers, and meta picked them up to make threads. So elon is claiming intellectual property theft.

                At no point did they mention that they were trying to save free speech. That wouldn’t make sense.

                I would hope elon loses this suit. You can’t force an employee you fired into a non disclosure agreement and then just not pay them wile locking them out of their field of work for 10 years.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah I don’t think he has a case either. I’m talking about the perceived motivations when his actions are consistent with his stated motivations (for running twitter, the ones mentioned in the comment thread I responded to), as evidenced by our own shared pairing of stated motivations and actions.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh anyone can threaten to sue. Let me know if he finds a lawyer to file that thinks they have standing. I wonder if mom competes are valid if you get laid off. They are mostly not valid at all in California already.

  • duckef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zucks hair looks like those tiktok vids of guys who’s baber fucked their haircut up.