cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/2678496

Introduction

Hello everybody, About 5 months ago I started building an alternative to the Searx metasearch engine called Websurfx which brings many improvements and features which lacks in Searx like speed, security, high levels of customization and lots more. Although as of now it lacks many features which will be added soon in futures release cycles but right now we have got everything stabilized and are nearing to our first release v1.0.0. So I would like to have some feedbacks on my project because they are really valuable part for this project.

In the next part I share the reason this project exists and what we have done so far, share the goal of the project and what we are planning to do in the future.

Why does it exist?

The primary purpose of the Websurfx project is to create a fast, secure, and privacy-focused metasearch engine. While there are numerous metasearch engines available, not all of them guarantee the security of their search engine, which is critical for maintaining privacy. Memory flaws, for example, can expose private or sensitive information, which is never a good thing. Also, there is the added problem of Spam, ads, and unorganic results which most engines don’t have the full-proof answer to it till now. Moreover, Rust is used to write Websurfx, which ensures memory safety and removes such issues. Many metasearch engines also lack important features like advanced picture search, which is required by many graphic designers, content providers, and others. Websurfx attempts to improve the user experience by providing these and other features, such as providing custom filtering ability and Micro-apps or Quick results (like providing a calculator, currency exchanges, etc. in the search results).

Preview

Home Page

Search Page

404 Page

What Do We Provide Right Now?

  • Ad-Free Results.
  • 12 colorschemes and a simple theme by default.
  • Ability to filter content using filter lists (coming soon).
  • Speed, Privacy, and Security.

In Future Releases

We are planning to move to leptos framework, which will help us provide more privacy by providing feature based compilation which allows the user to choose between different privacy levels. Which will look something like this:

  • Default: It will use wasm and js with csr and ssr.
  • Harderned: It will use ssr only with some js
  • Harderned-with-no-scripts: It will use ssr only with no js at all.

Goals

  • Organic and Relevant Results
  • Ad-Free and Spam-Free Results
  • Advanced Image Search (providing searches based on color, size, etc.)
  • Dorking Support (in other words advanced search query syntax like using And, not and or in search queries)
  • Privacy, Security, and Speed.
  • Support for low memory devices (like you will be able to host websurfx on low memory devices like phones, tablets, etc.).
  • Quick Results and Micro-Apps (providing quick apps like calculator, and exchange in the search results).
  • AI Integration for Answering Search Queries.
  • High Level of Customizability (providing more colorschemes and themes).

Benchmarks

Well, I will not compare my benchmark to other metasearch engines and Searx, but here is the benchmark for speed.

Number of workers/users: 16
Number of searches per worker/user: 1
Total time: 75.37s
Average time per search: 4.71s
Minimum time: 2.95s
Maximum time: 9.28s

Note: This benchmark was performed on a 1 Mbps internet connection speed.

Installation

To get started, clone the repository, edit the config file, which is located in the websurfx directory, and install the Redis server by following the instructions located here. Then run the websurfx server and Redis server using the following commands.

git clone https://github.com/neon-mmd/websurfx.git
cd websurfx
cargo build -r
redis-server --port 8082 &
./target/debug/websurfx

Once you have started the server, open your preferred web browser and navigate to http://127.0.0.1:8080 to start using Websurfx.

Check out the docs for docker deployment and more installation instructions.

Call to Action: If you like the project then I would suggest leaving a star on the project as this helps us reach more people in the process.

“Show your love by starring the project”

Project Link:

https://github.com/neon-mmd/websurfx

  • Kory@lemmy.ml
    15·
    1 year ago

    Great project, thanks for sharing.

    Quick question: will this be self-hosted only or will there be a public instance or something the like?

    • neon-mmd@programming.devOP
      2·
      1 year ago

      Sorry for the delay in reply.

      Great project, thanks for sharing.

      You’re welcome :).

      Quick question: will this be self-hosted only or will there be a public instance or something the like?

      Yes, actually we are working on providing a page dedicated to allow everyone in the community to contribute their Websurfx instance which will allow others to use them and try them out. Something similar to what Searx does (searx.space). So right now it is still a work in process.

  • 3yiyo3@lemmy.ml
    8·
    1 year ago

    It sounds pretty cool, but i’d like to know also if there is a public instance to try it rn.

    • neon-mmd@programming.devOP
      2·
      1 year ago

      Sorry for the delay in reply.

      Thanks for checking out my project :). Though right now we do not provide a public instance right now, but we are already working on this. Like we are working to provide a page dedicated to show all the instances hosted by the community members which will allow others to use them and try them out as well :).

  • XpeeN@sopuli.xyz
    1·
    1 year ago

    Nice work :) May I know where the “memory flaws” topic came from? Is this a claim about searxNG?

          • LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works
            21·
            1 year ago

            Redhat, DietPi (still use for Pi-hole, but I feel like that doesn’t count), Ubuntu, something Debian…I promise I gave it a chance, but it’s not for me

            • darcy@sh.itjust.works
              21·
              1 year ago

              have you tried a real distro like Arch™?

              /s… thats unfortunate. i know linux isnt for everyone

              • janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                3·
                1 year ago

                Quick question: What’s the goto distro for newbies these days, is it still Ubuntu? Back in the day (like a decade ago I think) I played about with both Ubuntu and Mint. I’m curious to try again, but no idea where to start. Also, is it possible/feasible/okay to dualboot on MacOS?

                • darcy@sh.itjust.works
                  3·
                  1 year ago

                  imo mint is still a great option for beginners. i would also recommend endevouros if you want something arch based that just works, but its not as great for absolute beginners. i could find some tutorials for mac dual booting, so i would assume its pretty similar to dual booting on windows, which is pretty easy to set up. its annoying to switch back and forth tho

                • FaeDrifter@midwest.socialEnglish
                  2·
                  1 year ago

                  I started with Ubuntu as a beginner and I don’t recommend it any more. Canonical keeps trying to reinvent things it’s own special way without consideration for the rest of the community, like Mir (dead), Unity (dead for a while, brought back by a community volunteer), and snap packages (more downsides than upsides).

                  Mint Debian Edition is a good way to go. My top recommendation right now is Fedora. Fresh but stable, and widely adopted so it’s easy to get help or find answers when you have a problem.

    • neon-mmd@programming.devOP
      11·
      1 year ago

      Sorry for the delay in reply.

      Thanks for the suggestion :). Currently, we don’t have any plans supporting windows and macOS because they are known notoriously bad for privacy reasons. And you may never know what they have in their source code like they are doing all notorious stuff, data mining, you name it. Because of which, we have no plans supporting it as of now, but if we get good amount of feature request in this are then we might consider adding support for these distros too :).