• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    That is really not a place you want anything medical called “ringworm” even if it isn’t actually a worm.

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      They really need to rename it. Pretty sure most people assume it’s a parasitic infection.

      • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I work in microbiology and only recently learned it’s actually a fungus.

        Disclaimer: I’m sure I’ve learned about it in the parasitology classes I’ve had but that was 15 years ago and since then I’ve been in bacteriology and sequencing.

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          What a great time to be in mycology, with all we’ve been learning about DNA, etc. I’m kind of jealous! Hope you enjoy your work.

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It got that name because the welts look like a worm in a circle under the skin. It looks like a raised red ring about 2-3cm in diameter that is usually pretty painful and itchy.

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    They made this big to-do just a couple of years ago about renaming monkeypox because they didn’t want to offend men who have sex with men, and now here we are with some fungal infection still being called “ringworm”.

    There’s no worm! No parasite of any kind. Really ridiculous name. Also, it can be caused by a number of different fungi, so it’s not even really all the same infection.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I believe mpox was, sadly, renamed because racists and their use of “monkey”. I think that was more the issue over men who have sex with men. “Ringworm” isn’t a slur though lol

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That hadn’t occurred to me. I assumed it was relating gay men to monkeys that was the problem. You’re probably right, though.

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not a slur; it’s just stigmatizing. “I’ve got a skin infection” will get a lot less of a negative reaction than “I’ve got ringworm” would. Parasites give people the heebie jeebies.