• dodeca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    11 months ago

    Threads? I completely forgot about Threads because this is the first time I’ve seen news about it since the week it launched. And I doom scroll Lemmy Everything every night.

    • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never heard of the expression “doom scroll”! It’s awesome! With your permission, I’ll start using it.

      I also doom scroll Lemmy every night (which is bad, since I should sleep, but good because I stopped going to Reddit)

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        Where were you doing COVID? That was when the phrase really was at its peak, as everyone was doing that to keep up with the news.

        • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was lucky enough to be working regularly during covid, but I didn’t say I’ve never doom scrolled!

          I just never heard the expression on Reddit (which is where I was at the time when wasting… I mean, investing my free time) :)

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Btw, is there a Lemmy app where you can disable infinite scrolling / set to 50 items per page or so?

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It keeps getting bumps in adoption every time Musk does something stupid. So, weekly or so.

      Honestly it’s kind of a chill service. If it wasn’t controlled by Meta, I’d be more active there. As it is, Mastodon is my jam.

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The problem is that the painfully earnest people went to Mastodon, the funny people went to BlueSky, the celebs went to Threads, and the mid-tier YouTubers and Streamers and Podcasters who have to be Internet Famous every damned day or they don’t get to eat stayed on Twitter.

    Personally I’m pulling for Mastodon because I’m a painfully earnest person.

    • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      If there was only some way for people on different microblog websites to talk to each other…

      Maybe some kind of open, decentralized protocol?

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If only. Some sort of text with added extra, like hypertext, and it could be used as a transport protocol. One can dream.

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    They want a social network designed in a way that single company have all control that would be abused after gaining enough users and advertisers?

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Trust me, we’ll do the exact same thing again, having learned nothing and with the same exact person on top. Literally the same exact thing that enabled all the fascists some months ago.

      It’s going to be great this time around!!

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Bluesky is literally just old Twitter but better. Why do people insist on hurting themselves with Threads?

    Edit: for those more technically inclined, it looks like there are now instructions on how to host your own Bluesky instance. It sounds like you may need a developer account before you can federate with the official instance though.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah the only problem with bluesky is that it still has such strict limits on who can join, and even who can see the content. Can’t exactly make it your online home for announcements and such if most people can’t see them there even if they wanted to.

    • atetulo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ll never understand why people are so excited for something that is proprietary and invite-only…

      Oh yeah, they’re idiots. I suspect bluesky is paying for a lot of viral marketing.

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, it’s because it’s less of a headache than Mastodon (everyone I’ve talked to likes the idea, but hates the implementation because they find it hard to navigate) and it’s not a mess like Threads or Twitter. What people want is 2015 Twitter because they’re not nerds. They want it to just work.

        As for the invite-only thing, I found it odd at first, but I kinda understand why people like it now. It makes it harder for assholes to join and if they do manage to get an invite, they’ll have to get another one after their account gets banned for bigotry or being a shithead.

    • shunir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Bluesky might be better Twitter, but if people doesn’t hear about it, or does not want to try it out, they’ll stay on Twitter. Or if they can’t stand Musk they go to Threads. Simply because those platforms are the biggest there.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Bluesky is spreading like wildfire in academia at least.

        And much like wildfire, it’s going to be a fucking disaster. I don’t understand why people who are paid to be critical thinkers would jump to another platform owned by a centralised actor. It’ll be the same shit all over again.

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Although with their proprietary solution, there’s a significant chance that Bluesky is going to be Twitter 2.0 if it ever gains traction. I’m rooting for fediverse to take off because my social media activity has shrunk to a couple of group chats with close friends and family plus occasional comments on Mastodon and Lemmy.

    • sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the invite system slows people joining vs Threads easy sign up. I agree that it is straight up old Twitter and enjoying myself on it. I just started getting invites , they go fast but definitely give them out. Seems like every time I see a post about it I don’t have a code to give out. Definitely need to just keep one on deck for the Lemmy comment section.

    • justaveg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      You know what would be hilarious? Eventually blue sky buys the leftovers of twitter and renames itself twitter. Although by that time it may not be a prudent move. So maybe not.

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve been under the impression that part of the reason for bluesky’s invite system is to help keep out bad actors. It makes it easier to ban someone and keep them from coming back. Buying Twitter would just open the floodgates.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Just buy twitter the brand but keep none of the user lists or tech stack, just the name. Honestly though I’ve been sick of twitter for years at this point and I would rather it be reduced to a footnote in history, an emblem of the bad times when a handful of billionaire assholes controlled all of our information ecosystems.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The detritus at X quickly bubbled over to the rest of the internet — some of it promoted by Elon Musk himself — to the point that the European Union threatened to ban the app over the Israel-Hamas misinformation problem.

    Last month, for example, the Washington Post reported that Threads had blocked users from searching for a variety of terms related to the news, including “Covid.”

    The company made a number of desperate changes across its family of apps over the last year or so to try and make users have a more pleasant experience online, tamping down news among them.

    Since then, Twitter never approached Facebook or Instagram’s numbers, but in terms of cultural relevance, it’s always been one of Zuck’s only real social media competitors

    Today, the prevailing model comes from TikTok, a platform that looks more like TV, with content made by people you’re only connected to as a fan or consumer.

    Bluesky and Mastodon, the hippest Twitter replacements, are happy to embrace news, but they’re comparatively tiny platforms, and the fun comes from the network effects of a large user base.


    The original article contains 823 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Darksouls1234@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What will they thread next to mastodon mastodon is the old Twitter, people were brainwashed by these two stinkers

  • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not to overly focus on aesthetics, but maybe Zuckerberg could take a few minutes away from his daily groping of paid-friends, and instead work with an acting coach to develop a look for photos that isn’t best described as Robot Rictus.