• mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Looks they failed to implement “open in default browset” and used “open in chrome” instead. Or maybe it has a stupid check if chrome is installed before opening link externally to avoid problems

  • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    If it’s trying to talk to a device over Bluetooth or USB, it’s not supported in Firefox. Mozilla refuses to implement WebUSB because they think the danger of letting people accidentally flash malware onto a physical device outweighs the benefits.

      • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It’s probably using WebView, or whatever it’s called where an android app brings up a browser window. If you have Firefox as your default web browser, apps will use it instead of chrome. It’s usually pretty nice, because if you have adblock in Firefox you also get adblock in the app.

        It’s possible that the sign-in webpage wants to talk to the camera before returning control to the app.

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I guess you are talking about the in app browser thing and not the webview. I just don’t get sign in requiring communication to the camera. Its things you usually do after signing in. But idk maybe a weird implementation

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah this is the remote shooting app, for camera control, it’ll use Bluetooth to establish connection with the camera and then switch to WiFi for live view.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Holy shit, Canon convinced you to install a mobile app? Who’s holding the gun to your head? We’ll dispatch authorities as soon as possible.

  • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just downloaded firefox focus, and etsy wont let me log in with it because it has adblocking. even to track a shipment. They even stopped putting the tracking number in the shipment email so i cant go directly to usps. Im sick of being railroaded into giving up my privacy.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have an very long blacklist of companies for this reason.

      The problem with standing up for your privacy is that it massively diminishes the resources available to you. I’m down to shopping at Costco as a single adult, because I had to say fuck you to Target recently, and my local grocery store was busy doing anti-union bullshit at the same time. So I’m driving further and probably paying more in the long run.

      But they aren’t principles if you don’t have to give something up to stick by them.

  • Jehuty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 days ago

    SO many corporate/govt websites do this. My health insurance and credit card company do it. It’s mind boggling. I always keep some variation of Chromium installed to deal with it and then go back to LibreWolf.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’ve not used LibreWolf, but assuming that Firefox addons are generally compatible, it might be worth trying Chrome Mask. It’s made by a Mozilla employee.

  • Gagootron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That reminds me of PayPal. I can’t use my hardware sevurity key to log in on mobile… Unless I enable desktop mode in firefox. Then it works

    • s08nlql9@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a native Android app from Canon (not a webpage) requiring to open Chrome instead of my default Firefox app.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          If this was a web view they wouldn’t even need this screen since it could just done in the “app” itself instead of needing to open an external browser.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If this was a web view they wouldn’t even need this screen since it could just done in the “app” itself instead of needing to open an external browser.

      • alfredon996@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand, but if the application opens the browser you have to make it believe that it is opening Chrome

          • alfredon996@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            For that you need a ROM that supports signature spoofing, but it should be possible, just not for the common user, sadly

        • ewenak@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          But you can’t make a native app think it is opening Chrome when it’s opening Firefox with just an extension. The extension only changes things inside the browser, but the Canon app probably checks the app ID of the browser it’s opening, which is done at the level of the Android system, and which is not affected by the extension.

  • longjohnjohnson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Typically they have a dependency on something only one browser can do, and rather than using a polyfill or a better browser, force their bad technical decisions onto the user.

    • ewenak@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair some things can’t be polyfilled, like the WebUSB API, as someone mentioned in the comments. But lots of the sites could fix their code so it works on Firefox, yeah.