Last Tuesday, as the strongest Atlantic storm in 90 years slammed the western coast of Jamaica with 185-mph winds, Bill Gates was downplaying climate change.

The billionaire does not appear to have publicly addressed the disaster in Jamaica, which extended throughout the Caribbean, with Melissa having killed dozens across Cuba, Haiti, the Bahamas, and the Dominican Republic. And his overall point, frankly, does not hold up to scrutiny.

Gates isn’t alone; climate change has slipped down the world’s priority list in the past few years—and it shows. Governments and corporations are shelving emissions goals, budgets are being redirected from climate initiatives to warfare, the media is pivoting away from climate journalism, and even activists are urging a softer, more “hopeful” tone. It all signals a vibe shift in how we talk about climate change, reframing it from the existential risk it actually poses to a less urgent, peripheral issue—even as the floodwaters reach our front doors.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Epstein, from who melinda seperated from when she found out. his "current entrepuenership, was nothing more than money laundering and reinventing his own image from his MS ceo/epstein days, he did not charity by accident/genuine. plus he was criticized for his “vaccine colonialism” during covid by african countries.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Quiet, you fool! Don’t antagonize him. You think all that Windows AI is out there for our benefit? Oh no, it’s there for Bill to press the button and blue screen the world. And don’t tell me Linux users are safe; that’s what the assassination squads are for.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Nah, not respectfully, bill Gates is a piece of shit who has spent millions in charities to pretend he’s a nice guy.

    I too can pretend to be really nice by slamming millions around even though I have acted like a shit stain before.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      i once tried to question him when he did an AMA like a decade ago, the mods/filters dint allow it though,specifically about him money laundering.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      By all means do so then, please. An asshole spending millions on charity helps way more people than a nice guy receiving government aid.

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          And a car has a smaller climate footprint than a ship transporting solar panels, or the factory producing them. What is your point?

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Respectfully, Bill Gates is complicit in genocide and should be investigated for his connections with Epstein.

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Irrespectfully most tech moguls need to shut the fuck up, especially about shit that has nothing to do with tech

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      he was always known to be ruthless during his ceo days, his current image is trying to reinvent, and also to soften the blow of him being associated with epstein.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      This does have to do with tech because the firm he founded is knee deep in the AI bullshit which is burning energy at an incredible rate.

    • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      All billionaires are inherently evil by their own nature. Unless they literally won the lottery with take home $1 billion.

      To become a billionaire you have to do some dark Machiavellian deeds whether by exteeme exploitation of human labour or manipulation of the most unethical proportions. A billion in wealth is something quite unimaginable before the 20th century, and the means to obtain that level of wealth in history has always been dark and dirty.

  • etherphon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe there is hope for a world where being rich doesn’t mean you are assumed to be wise and all knowing and should be consulted on everything.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean… looking at people like Neil deGrasse Tyson, you don’t need to be super rich for people to give your intelligence too much credit.

      • etherphon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He’s definitely a very smart man, in his field, but yeah that doesn’t translate to having the answers to everything or even having common sense sometimes.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          he also, has a list of women accusing him of sexual misconduct, none of the incidence could be proven, but they were 4 separate women in very different locations. He’s charming on talk shows. No actual scientists get invited on talk shows.

          • etherphon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I mean, Carl Sagan, but yeah not really much currently. I feel like due to streaming everything has been kind of put in it’s own little box, everyone can have their own show and no one needs to interact with people different than them.

  • Poayjay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I remember when he did an AMA on Reddit and every comment about his Epstein connection was instantly buried.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      i remember that to, i questioned about his charities being used a way to evade tax, of course the AMA sub would remove it. He want adulations about him giving “christmas gifts” on reddit, im guessing its one of the reasons he stopped going on reddit, like the finebros, they wanted adorations instead was driven off to facebook for being shills of YT. currently Sinese, gary has been on REDDIT frequently, he appeared right before the election, hmm suspicious, virtue signalling for vets. plus he gave a excuse to why he left acting(i wanna guess is that his time im HW wouldve come to end with him being outwardly republican now, if he became vitrolitic, as the other Rs actors, and not because of his SON).

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    Don’t ask whether it’s distraction from Epstein list, ask whether everything bad is distraction from climate change and wealth inequality.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      its mostly distraction from epstein, suddenly he started to “act out” when more attention was given to epstein files as of recently. it also make sense why hes doing charities, beside tax evasion/monely laundering, he using the goodwill image, to put himself in a positive light.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe he should stop raping children, aiding genocide and supporting climate deniers instead of treating philanthropy like a pre-reformation nobleman buying indulgences to get into heaven?