The idea of expelling Arabs to other countries was once linked to Meir Kahane and other far-right radicals, and thus considered anathema by most Israelis. Now, to the delight of right-wingers, the idea is gaining traction as a ‘moral’ solution to the war.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        taking the mask off

        They already have; now they’re in “Who do you believe, us or your lying eyes?” mode.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, this is called ethnic cleansing. Not genocide. It is to prevent genocide.

      EDIT: for those downvoting me, please do not downvote for the reasons as if I support this. I am simply pointing out on incorrect usage of the words, and their logic without supporting it.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s genocide in the same way the Armenian genocide is a genocide. When you forcibly move millions of people from one place to another a lot of them die. Think trail of tears.

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          One is killing people, another is moving them to different place. I feel there is difference.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not quite. According to the UN there are five genocidal acts:

            killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group.

            It doesn’t have to kill them, but to destroy a group of people (their identity) via forced relocation would be one of them.

            • MxM111@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, genocide can be done together with ethnic cleansing, more over, arguably any genocide IS ethnic cleansing. However, not every ethnic cleansing is genocide. Removal of Jewish settlement from Gaza Strip when Gaza Strip was given autonomy is an example of ethnic cleansing without genocide.

              • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You keep making this stupid argument that “not every ethic cleansing is a genocide”, which acknowledges that some are, and failing to argue why this one is not.

          • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Russia was moving Ukrainian children into Russia, that’s a component of genocide. German Jews were forced into ghettos, then into concentration camps. The ghettos didn’t “prevent” genocide, they facilitated it.

            The United Nations first defined genocide in 1948 in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The treaty outlines five acts that can constitute genocide if they are done “with the intent to destroy an ethnic, national, racial or religious group”:

            1. Killing members of the group
            2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm
            3. Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction in whole or in part
            4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births
            5. Forcibly transferring children

            https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/whats-the-difference-between-genocide-and-ethnic-cleansing

            They both serve the purpose of erasing the identity of a people. The methods and means are common between the two: you destroy their homes, you force them to move, you starve them, you kill the ones who don’t comply, and you leave the weak and struggling to die. The distinction you’re making matters in a UN court, where Genocide has a legal definition and legal consequences, whereas Ethnic Cleansing does not. But that doesn’t make ethnic cleansing some preferable alternative to genocide.

            If you told a civilian in Gaza “you’re not being genocided, you’re being ethnically cleansed!” Do you think that would change their understanding of the situation much?

      • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not an incorrect usage though, so for the crime of being both wrong AND a useless pedant, you get downvoted!

  • Machinist3359@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of jim crow and the “back to africa” position advocated for as the more kind way to treat fornerly enslaved folks. “We’re treating you so poorly, wouldnt you rather leave?” Big morality brain

  • derphurr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    If only Israel would have rebuilt the rail lines in Gaza… I’m waiting to hear about a secret IDF manned ovens…

  • whereisk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Immediately stinks because it’s clearly self-serving dishonesty that treats the others as second class humans - they wouldn’t accept the reverse of it.

    Should kick themselves out to a different land if they’re so keen on it.