ghostarchive

Describing it as part of an “all-out offensive” to promote the French language in Quebec and “halt the decline in Montreal,” a Legault government task force will seek to increase tuition fees for foreign or out-of-province students attending English-language universities in Quebec.

“We’re fed up with managing a decline, of protecting the language, of slowing the erosion of the language, these are defensive terms. It’s time to regain ground,” Quebec French-language minister Jean-François Roberge said in an interview with La Presse. “If we want to change the linguistic profile of Montreal, to stop the decline in Montreal, we must focus on the question of rebalancing university networks.”

Roberge said that while 80 per cent of Quebec students attend French-language universities, only half of the 32,000 foreign or out-of-province students who study here do so as well.

“There are a lot of people who come to Quebec, who attend an English-language university and who very often express themselves in the English language on a daily basis.”

The task force also intends to table legislation that would oblige online giants such as Spotify and Netflix to make Quebec-produced content “more visible.”

Roberge’s announcement comes a little over a week after the Coalition Avenir Québec suffered a stinging defeat at the hands of the Parti Québécois in a byelection in the Quebec City riding of Jean-Talon.

  • @Rocket@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    -2
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That control isn’t “supply and demand”. It’s just price regulation.

    Did you not even read your own comment? Like you suggested, supply and demand is a reaction to (more accurately, observe of) the state of the market. What is all this nonsense?

    Also why did you immediately take me in bad faith?

    Because there is no reasonable explanation for how you gave a perfectly valid description for supply and demand, but then go off to crazy town as if you don’t even know what you said other than you looking for a fight.

    But falsely claiming that it’s a response to the supply being less than what’s demanded when there’s literally no indication of that

    Claimed what now? I said it was to keep interest in anglo schools in check. That is not the same as “supply being less than what is demanded”, whatever that is supposed to mean.

    • ramOP
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Rocket@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        -4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You’re honestly tiresome. I’m blocking you and your weird-ass rhetoric.

        Okay, and? Is there some reason you want us to know this?

        but you honestly need to learn what the words “supply and demand” mean.

        Your definition was fine. Is there some reason you don’t like it anymore?