@ovay@discuss.tchncs.de to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 9 months agoInvidious vs Piped. Which is better?message-square45fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up199arrow-down1message-squareInvidious vs Piped. Which is better?@ovay@discuss.tchncs.de to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square45fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@hottari@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish4•9 months agoPiped uses less CPU on client playback and features like dash actually work as opposed to invidious. But I’m glad creating a piped instance on docker is complicated because I like the simplicity of invidious’ UI.
Piped uses less CPU on client playback and features like dash actually work as opposed to invidious. But I’m glad creating a piped instance on docker is complicated because I like the simplicity of invidious’ UI.