Long time Windows user here. I’ve been a M$ sysadmin at a large healthcare conglomerate for 20+ years. It’s all M$ products that I work with.

Anyway…I’ve dabbled here and there with Linux, ran it in VM’s or dual booted, but I’ve always gone back to my comfort zone of Windows.

I’ve “recently” (last 6 months") tied Kubuntu and I did like it, but really hated Snap, so about 3 weeks ago I jumped to Mint. Now I know that both distros are Linux training wheels, but I have to say that I’m really impressed! I forget how fast and responsive Linux is without all the bloat that you get with Windows. The main detractor of sticking with Linux before was gaming, but with Lutris now filling in that gap, there’s nothing holding me back.

For the first time, I would really recommend Linux to friends and (selective) family.

Long story short, after 25+ years of using Windows almost exclusively, I’ve finally made the jump and just blew away my entire M$ partition and I don’t feel bad in the least.

I’m sure I’ll be hanging around this sub for a long time, and I’ll make a jump to a more traditional distro like Debian or Suse. but for now, I’m really impressed with how far Linux has come.

<p>

Edit- Wow, thank you for all the love and support! I’m very happy to hear that I"m in good company with Mint. <p>

I love all the great suggestions too for Vbox alts and game launcher. Gotta love this community. <3

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      12·
      9 months ago

      What this guy/gal said. Linux user for 25 years here, 10ish of which have been exclusive. And I run Mint on my main PC.

      Because when I can finally wind down after the kids are in bed and I can hear myself think, I just want shit that works, without having to dick around with manual kernel modules and other custom stuff to get basic things working … I get paid to do the latter at work, and I get enough of it there.

  • MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org
    25·
    9 months ago

    Welcome to the party! Never let anyone get you down for using a “beginner” distro; it’s perfectly valid to want a system that just works. :)

      • MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org
        5·
        9 months ago

        Shoot, I’d probably be one of them if not for my need to have Wayland and slightly newer libraries for my A770.

          • MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org
            2·
            9 months ago

            I’m watching Cinnamon’s Wayland rollout with great interest. No Pipewire sharing yet (among other things), but I’m excited for the future.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        2·
        9 months ago

        I installed my first distro, slackware, from diskettes in the 90s, so Im not exactly a newbie. I now use Mint ( just works but you can get under the hood fine), with both a dual boot windows and a VM for when I don’t want to reboot, since I use a few programs that are windows only. The setup works fine for me. That said I’m playing with NixOS. Definitely not for the masses, but awesome.

    • agr8lemon@lemmy.zipOP
      8·
      9 months ago

      Thanks! It’s great to read in there that even some of the seasoned Linux folks use Mint!

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        1·
        9 months ago

        I use linux for a couple years as a server and for 6-9 months as a daily. Am also a sysadmin.

        Mint works great but is very simple. Ubuntu works good as well but the proprietary snap store is shit imo Switched to debian & kde yesterday and am already fully set up. Not without any hickups but a great experience so far. Maybe try a second hard drive to switch out and install debian if you’re feeling like it. Its pretty cool.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      3·
      9 months ago

      Well, it’s not like more advanced distros are built to not work. Rather, they work better for different focus points.
      So, I would encourage people, especially those with a techy background, to take a look around eventually, but yeah, your conclusion to that journey may as well be that Mint was nice, actually.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    25·
    9 months ago

    Now I know that both distros are Linux training wheels

    They’re both good distros with a lot of functionality. No need to denigrate them because they’re easy to use.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.world
      4·
      9 months ago

      Honnestly. I find LFS more of a training wheel.

      Mint is one of the easiest distros that just works imo. No reason to not use it.

  • h3ndrik@feddit.de
    12·
    9 months ago

    👍

    I think you’re fine with choosing Mint or whatever distribution you like.

  • dingus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    9 months ago

    They are intro distros, sure, but don’t ever think that you have to move to anything else if you don’t want to. Mint is probably the best Linux distro there is if your goal is ease of use, support, and “it just works”. I’d say that’s more than enough for what people want in an OS. I recommend it to anyone looking to hop into Linux, be it temporarily or permanently. People jump into other distros for specific use cases or because they feel like fucking around with something…but that’s absolutely not required or necessary to be a Linux user or advocate.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nzEnglish
    9·
    9 months ago

    I have been using various distros since 2008; I use Mint as my daily driver.

    Stability is the biggest factor for me, I want a OS to get out of my way and let me get on with what I’m doing.

    • agr8lemon@lemmy.zipOP
      1·
      9 months ago

      And that always makes me laugh. I’ve made a good living for myself trying to keep his servers functional lol.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
    7·
    9 months ago

    Linux mint is amazing. I’ve used Linux for many years and it’s still nice. I do wish Linux mint had a more free software install option but that’s a minor complaint.

  • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
    6·
    9 months ago

    Welcome aboard! 🐧

    If you decide later to test other distros I would highly recommend using a virtual machine in virtualbox. Saves the hassle when it comes to testing distros 👍

      • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
        3·
        9 months ago

        KVM is indeed a much better hypervisor, but it does require some setup with the terminal.

        Since he is a beginner I decided to recommend virtualbox since it just works after installing. But if he doesn’t mind setting up things via terminal then KVM is definitely the way.

        • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
          4·
          9 months ago

          @agr8lemon@lemmy.zip The other person mentioned virt-manager, but there’s a much more easier app: Gnome Boxes. It uses the same backend (libvirt/KVM) but it’s much more easier to use - in fact, I’d say that it’s even more easier to use than VirtualBox. For starters, Boxes automatically detects OS ISOs on your drive and allows you to just click on them directly to install it - or you can even choose to download and install a distro directly from within Boxes. Also, when you consider the post-setup phase: there’s no need to install any guest modules/drivers because it’s already built-into Linux distros.

          https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/gnome-boxes-easy-way-set-virtual-machines-linux/

        • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
          1·
          9 months ago

          I’ve worked extensively with both virtualbox and kvm/qemu. While I prefer kvm since it’s open source, I could never reproduce the video performance of virtualbox. I’m not even trying to game, just use regular applications that I cannot run under Linux.

          I wonder if I’m missing something.