The source you told me to look at says they have the same amount of bias. This seems to be a “what are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” situation.
You made multiple statements saying it was more biased as if it were a fact. You also said that site would prove that it is more biased.
Now you are admitting it doesn’t prove it. I gave you plenty of chances and you kept moving the goalposts and pretending you didn’t say something when I even copied and pasted you saying it.
So you’ve been dishonest this entire time.
I don’t think we need to continue this conversation. I’m not interested in talking to people who construct elaborate but obvious lies.
What you said:
Then you directed me to a website which said they have the same amount of bias.
So either you didn’t think I would check or you didn’t check.
Removed by mod
The source you told me to look at says they have the same amount of bias. This seems to be a “what are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” situation.
Removed by mod
You said one was more biased than the other. You have yet to show that is the case.
Removed by mod
That still doesn’t show that it is more biased than the other source. That just shows that it has a bias, something no one has denied.
Removed by mod
We can not assume any such thing.
You made multiple statements saying it was more biased as if it were a fact. You also said that site would prove that it is more biased.
Now you are admitting it doesn’t prove it. I gave you plenty of chances and you kept moving the goalposts and pretending you didn’t say something when I even copied and pasted you saying it.
So you’ve been dishonest this entire time.
I don’t think we need to continue this conversation. I’m not interested in talking to people who construct elaborate but obvious lies.