lawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 11 months agoClimate Summitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up11.89Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.87Karrow-down1imageClimate Summitlemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·11 months agoIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down12·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down2·11 months agoIt would cost far more to not address the issue.
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·11 months agoBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoNo, it’s making fun of that assumption.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·11 months agoSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·11 months agoWhat conversation are we having?
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
deleted by creator
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
deleted by creator
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
deleted by creator
What conversation are we having?
deleted by creator