• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Having now had firsthand experience with this, I’m very happy I didn’t buy it myself. It is so soulless. And the characters feel nothing like their inspirations, while they are distinct, their distinctions just aren’t between Harley Quinn and Captain Boomerang and so on. They’re just “random asymmetric abilities we tossed in”.

    Ah well, GaaS ruins another in-theory solid idea for a game.

  • DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    They had to have seen the writing on the wall at least a year or two before they brought this to market.

    I seem to remember that at about a year before launch there was some reporter (Jason Schreier?) who had an inside tip that they were changing some stuff in the face of the realization that GaaS were not the money maker they were thought to be once upon a time, but the tipper also said that they were too locked into the GaaS paradigm to make the sort of meaningful changes that would salvage the experience. I don’t think there’s any rescuing this one if they knew they were in trouble a full year before delivery and still couldn’t shape it up into a product worthy of attention.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      There was a similar comment about that. How they are in a sunk cost fallacy for all the GaaS promises they made a few years ago. And to not release it means they make zero.

      Versus releasing and maybe they make some money back.

      Hoping they could salvage something.

  • maness300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve always thought looter shooters were shit and revolving a game around loot was a shitty idea.

  • Rainman@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I hope Rocksteady turns the disappointing launch around and Suicide Squad has decent success down the line.

    I am a massive Suicide Squad fan, so I decided to get the game early, even though I normally stay away from Live-Service and Always-online games. The game is very entertaining in Cutscenes and the banter between the Squad is hilarious. That alone made me enjoy the Story experience very much and I feel like getting the game was worth it for me personally. There is sadly a lot of valid criticism around the game and Rocksteady has to release a much needed Patch soon to fix early issues and they need a very good Season 1 Content drop in March, or I don’t think this game will have any long lasting success.

    I understand everyone who either dismisses this game on the Live-Service aspect alone or waits on deep sales for this game. If this game wasn’t so agressively designed as a live-service looter shooter, but as a single player shooter (maybe with Multiplayer added later on?) with the same story, it would have been a bigger success.

    There is fun to be had in the game and there is still potential for it to become great and ultimately successful, but it will take passion and commitment from WB and Rocksteady throughout the next year.

    • echoplex21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m honestly just gonna wait till it’s on GamePass in a year or so. Would love to play as a 9 hour ish Campaign with a lot of customization once the abandon the GaaS stuff.