The locomotive of a cargo train derailed in northern Colorado early Wednesday, spilling hundreds of gallons of diesel, authorities said.

The Great Western Railway locomotive did not tip over when it went off the rails at a switch in the tracks just before 1 a.m. but a fuel tank was punctured, the Loveland Fire Rescue Authority said in a Facebook post. The spill was contained and did not get into any waterways, it said.

No one was injured in the derailment, which happened near a sugar factory in an area not far from some homes, Battalion Chief Kevin Hessler said. The other locomotive and three cars carrying sugar did not derail, he said.

  • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not to minimize this, but could have been much worse. 100’s of gallons instead of 1000’s. Train remained upright. Sounds like they got lucky.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Well yes, you see: we contained it in the environment. Fully contained. No chance of it leaving the environment.”

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          “we’ll just burn off what ever we can’t scoop up with a dust pan and then the air will full contain the spill.”

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      We should not focus on gratitude that it wasn’t worse. Everything could always be worse. The point is to make things better.

      Spilled oil is objectively bad, and to be harshly criticized, every time.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        To address this a bit further up, where more eyes can see it: yes, be pissed that this happened at all, but it’s absolutely okay to be thankful it wasn’t worse. To not be thankful it was hundreds and not thousands, tens of thousands, is psychotic. Don’t let that keep you from your anger at these companies, though. The derailment still happened, fuel was still spilled, don’t forget it.

        • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Don’t let that keep you from your anger at these companies, though. The derailment still happened, fuel was still spilled

          The only thing worth saying here.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What a false dichotomy. You can be thankful things weren’t worse, AND be pissed off it happened at all. Two things can exist at the same time it happens every day!

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                They’re offering a bit of hope to people, that it isn’t as bad as other recent incidents. And that’s true. OP also probably doesn’t HAVE any meaningful solutions, they’re probably about 40 steps removed from anything that could impact this. May as well let people know it’s not another MASSIVE spill.

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                And you’re an ignoramus and buffoon, I can do that too. Got an actual rebuttal, or just wanna prove yourself as dense as you seem to be?

                • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’d rather have somebody pretend to perceive me as an “ignoramus and buffoon” than to make people feel grateful for an oil spill.

            • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              The same logic applies to any situation where we naturally want to prevent future incidents. We should not focus on gratitude that it wasn’t worse. Everything could always be worse. The point is to make things better.

              Spilled oil is objectively bad, and to be harshly criticized, every time.

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Spilled fuel (not oil) is objectively bad, but a small spill is objectively less bad than a large spill.

                To take your rape analogy, it’s more like non-pentrative sexual assault vs full blown rape. Both are sexual assault, both are bad, but one is worse.

                The big problem here is that the root cause of a small spill like this is the same as for the large spills: poor maintenance and lack of enforcement in the rail industry. The only reason this was a small spill is pure luck. Thus, this deserves equal criticism, but we can still be thankful for the luck.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      You beat me too it! I was just going to link this since I just watched it.

      tl;dw train regulations have been stripped back so much that government regulators inspect just 1% of train operations and have no idea where any trains are or what they’re carrying, leaving following regulations up to the corporations. The largest corporation has placed “safety” as #4 in their list of priorities and runs their trains with just 2 overworked employees who regularly state they have no time to check that the train is running properly and warn that a derailment of a train carrying fuel will flatten a major american city some day soon if regulations aren’t changed.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You know who owns the rails? Fucking Warren Buffet, like that cunt needs any more fucking wealth.

  • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    It sure is a good thing we didn’t give those train engineers enough vacation time and sick days! /s

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hundreds ain’t great but the average train these days has 20000 tons of cargo behind it – could have been a lot worse.

    Derailments are pretty common, actually. Like dozens to hundreds a year depending on the size of the company. I suspect a few incidents last year have made the news extra sensitive.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most derailments are basically just the train falling off the track, very slightly. This was a full on train crash.

      • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        From the article and video, this seems to be one of those times it slightly came off the track. There doesn’t seem to have been collision and the train remained upright.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I dunno, it’s kind of borderline imo. It certainly suffered some damage, rather than a low speed step off that simply needs a crane to put things back into place.

          If you do something with your car and it suffers damage, it’s hard not to call that a crash. You might be able to drive it afterwards while holding the steering wheel at an odd angle, but you’ve still suffered crash-level damage.

          • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Sure, there’s damage, but the train didn’t crash into anything. If I drove into the shoulder of the road and ran over a piece of debris, I could easily damage my car, but I didn’t crash the car.

            There’s not really anything subjective here, the train didn’t crash into anything. It derailed and suffered damage.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              If I drove into the shoulder of the road

              See that’s technically a crash. You collided with the curb. It might not be a crash into another vehicle or into something like a tree or a lamppost, but you’re still crashing into something.

              In this case, the train collided with the ground, after falling off the rails. A low speed derailment would have no damage - akin to spinning out in an open road or something - but if you hit something and cause damage that breaches some threshold.

              • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Driving over the lane lines does not involve hitting a curb. As I said, in this hypothetical scenario I drove into the shoulder and debris damaged my car. I did not crash.

                There’s nothing subjective about this incident. The train derailed. The train remained upright. The train did not collide with an object. The train was damaged. Honestly, you’re really doing some mental gymnastics to rationalize your decision to call it a collision. If you’re just going to do whatever you need to do to convince yourself that it was a collision, nothing I’m going to say will change your mind.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      In the US, maybe. Last derailment we had in Czechia was in 2010. Germany had it last year, but it’s still less than once a year.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am curious about the amount of rail in those countries vs the US. I know Europe likes their passenger trains a ton more than the US, but the US loves freight trains, and that seems to be where most of the derailments happen.

        If the United States has, like, 20x the freight rail/trains, it would make sense for them to have 20x more derailments, essentially adjusting for population of freight trains. Not to give a pass to the States, for sure, but knowing this number would be a bit more helpful.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Wow thanks for the information. I think this pretty well illustrates the point. The states have 22 times the rail as Czechia, so we’d expect Czechia to have 1/22 the incidents the states have. Now we need the number of incidents in each country and we can make a proper comparison.

            I don’t expect you to provide that, though, you’ve been more than enough help for a villain of such infamy miss Bonny ;p

  • moshankey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Where’s BoBo? It is Colorado. Is she still blaming Buttigieg for the woes of American transportation?