• reversebananimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Its a negative feedback loop. Journalism revenue dropped when the internet became popular, so news companies sqeezed their remaining paid customers even harder (more ads, higher subscriptions, more anti-consumer tactics). As a result, even more people dropped off and the news companies once again responded by making things worse.

    Similar to streaming vs. piracy (people were glad to pay for Netflix when it was GOOD), I still believe the root of the issue lies primarily with the service being offered.

    I’d like to pay for more news, but I know the second I get a subscription I’m going to get junk mail and harassment from that company for the rest of my life to upgrade what I’m already paying or resubscribe. As a result, I only donate to small outlets that treat their readers well.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think outlets like Apple News+ or Artifact are the only solution to this. People don’t want to keep up with twenty different news site subscriptions, or navigate around ad-ridden websites to get their news. Aggregators with a flat fee to unlock paywalled content, where the news site gets a cut seems the way to go.