Amazon CEO tells staff ‘it’s probably not going to work out’ unless they visit office three days a week
www.theguardian.com
Almost 30,000 workers signed petition against return-to-office mandate in May

Amazon CEO tells staff to work in office three days a week or look for another job::Almost 30,000 workers signed petition against return-to-office mandate in May

  • irotsoma@lemmy.worldEnglish
    64·
    1 year ago

    This plus management needs to justify its existence. Workers have proven they can be productive without micromanagement, which means management is a waste of money. Every worker knows that, but they’re afraid of shareholders deciding they want companies to automate management instead of laying off workers to increase profit. And if that happens, it’s just a few small leaps to cutting the biggest waste of money of all, CEOs.

      • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyzEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        There’s a bit of truth to that. Honestly, leadership via email/chat is hard. Bad managers can’t micromanage and pretend to know what’s going on, so they get screwed. Good managers (which I promise do exist) have a hard time really getting their team to excel and know what the real problems are that they can address and fix. So, every team ends up in a range of mediocrity either rising from not having to deal with useless managers or not able to reach their full potential with good managers.

        Is that bad? Eh, probably not.

        • SamboT@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Bad managers are a waste of resources just like bad front line employees are a waste of resources. Any role that has less oversight has more potential for abuse that is harder for the company to recognize. It’s probably easier to notice an underperforming employee in person than it is virtually.

          The longer term effect on growth of talent and teams is probably still largely unknown.