The reproduced messages follow a starkly different point of view Musk represented last week, when he sued OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman, alleging breach of contract and unfair competition.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The way companies and ownership work that’s actually quite possible and reasonable.

    The count of shares you have represent how much control you have over a company.

    If you own a company private or public that does well and you want to retain control of it, you need to own at least over 50% of the voting rights.

    Wanting to control your company isn’t that outlandish a desire. There have been plenty of stories of people getting ousted over the years.

    Simply owning a company that does well could result in you becoming a billionaire.

    And I’m not arguing against what the other poster said, to get to that point there’s gotta be some level of ruthlessness, disregard for others etc.

    Just that there is actually a reason to desire more even if you have all your needs met. Being rich shouldn’t mean you have to give up control, and its really hard to change corporate structure once public.

    Facebook for example is set up where Zuckerberg has >50% voting rights. Is that bad? Probably. But it’s his company, and I don’t fault him for wanting to keep it that way.

    Edit: and yes I’m aware of Zucks fuckery to get / maintain that share and his co-founders

        • STOMPYI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          So a sociopath with little empathy is allowed to have insane power because we don’t want to negate what you think is a natural human desire for more? That same desire which we are arguing is sociopathic? You are empathizing with billionaires and defending disparity because we don’t want to dampen the human spirit which you feel is centered around desire? I’m not baiting you anymore just curious how you end up with such a different view, unless you are a billionaire… You crafted this odd story of ownership to illustrate a point and its only providing me evidence of the sickness that started this conversation…

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            A natural desire to manage what they created or regain that control if they (willingly) gave it up and regret the decision.

            The idea that people have that they can just rip away control of a company from someone because it made them rich is frankly, disgusting.

            There’s really only two ways to become a billionaire, and that’s investing, or owning a company, so it’s not really a odd story to come up with.