The homeowner who fatally shot a 20-year-old University of South Carolina student who tried to enter the wrong home on the street he lived on Saturday morning will not face charges because the incident was deemed “a justifiable homicide” under state law, Columbia police announced Wednesday.

Police said the identity of the homeowner who fired the gunshot that killed Nicholas Donofrio shortly before 2 a.m. Saturday will not be released because the police department and the Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s Office determined his actions were justified under the state’s controversial “castle doctrine” law, which holds that people can act in self-defense towards “intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil action for acting in defense of themselves and others.”

  • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would you have possibly tried, I dunno, yelling first? Seems like if you’re already armed there wouldn’t be much danger in say “WHAT THE FUCK ARE DOING?”. It says nowhere in this story they actually tried stopping him, just that they phoned the cops, window broke, they shot him.

    • tider06@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also doesn’t say if they didn’t. We have no reason to believe that they didn’t yell at him.

      But yeah, if someone pounds on my door at 2am, then tries to force the door open, then smashes my window to try and unlock the door, I’m not waiting til they get inside to see if they are peaceful.

      Not risking my life or the lives of my wife and kids on wishful thinking. It’s a tragedy that the guy lost his life, it really is. But he didn’t exactly leave a lot of wiggle room for the homeowners in the house he was invading.

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What makes you think they didn’t do that? Why is your default assumption that they just started firing?

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, police are known to release all information immediately and also news articles are absolutely known to do the same. Thanks for reminding me!

          You’re taking the worst possible interpretation and running with it. I recommend not doing that

    • Orionza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I’m thinking. Call the police first?! That’s a normal response. Not reach for a gun and shoot the person to death. And the student didn’t get inside. I thought an intruder who could be killed was someone who made it inside. So anyone outside the door is fair game, even if they’re knocking and banging?

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A female resident called 911 as Donofrio kicked the door, while a male resident went to retrieve a firearm elsewhere in the home

        They literally did that.

        Donofrio broke a glass window on the front door “and reached inside to manipulate the doorknob,” at which point the male resident fired the shot through the broken window

        Breaking a window and then attempting to open the door is enough to justify killing in self defense under local laws, even if the intruder has not entered the building yet.

        The article is specifically written to have a headline that implies someone got away with murder, to get traffic. The point of articles like this is to profit, not to inform.

        Man shot while breaking and entering, is a much less profitable headline.