Somehow this is the only country on earth where this seems to happen. When talking about shootings involving guns, okay, fine, the US is certainly an outlier there, but every country has cars and police.

This is murder.

  • Compactor9679@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, she is told to get out, she does not. And she starts the can and try to run over the officer? Why are we surpriced she was shot?

    • WorldWideLem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If she was trying to run him over why did she cut the wheel as far as she could to try and get around him?

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because she wasn’t trying to run him over.

        The racist trolls know that, but they’re racist trolls so they say dumb shit to see if idiots and other trolls will believe them.

        These are the same people who think Ashley Babbitt shouldn’t have been shot for trying to storm the congress building.

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because as we have access to human reasoning combined with data, it can be seen that these events regularly occur throughout the world with far lesser routine brutality and death as the outcome.

      The existence of data sets restricted by country are a natural dataset that can shine a light on outliers. When it comes to certain types of brutality, when a country becomes notable, is it unreasonable to ask questions? I would say that it is completely reasonable to do so.

      What I would say is unreasonable to do, is to look at the event with a microscope when such macrosropic data exists. Or to express surprise that people wouldn’t expect extrajudicial execution of a mother and child. It shines the light back on the asker of the question, “Are they unaware, ignorant, or more-commonly, willfully ignorant.?”

      The willfully ignorant are often trying to bend the world to their conception of the world instead of seeing it as it is, because that would require a call to action. We would have to identify a problem and fix it and this type of data is inconvenient, but I don’t know you, so I can’t be sure of your intentions. I hope you are able to receive this as well as it was intended, and perhaps empathize with people who still feel surprise when executions occur without trial.

      Do you want to live in a world where such executions are no longer surprising, but instead a routine occurrence?