Somehow this is the only country on earth where this seems to happen. When talking about shootings involving guns, okay, fine, the US is certainly an outlier there, but every country has cars and police.

This is murder.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I already said that they shouldn’t have drawn weapons didn’t I?

    Your story about how they should follow her from a distant and stop her once she gets out is just fantasy. That’s also not where the fault lies.

    Her trying to run one over is vehicular assault at best. Yes. The police stood there on purpose. To make sure she didn’t take off. That’s fine. Dare I say common procedure in multiple countries, not just the US.

    Pretty sure it’s been stated everywhere that their education and work culture is a big problem. I agree. The police conduct that lead up to the shooting was poor. I agree.

    The moment she tries to run one over. It was only going to end 1 way.

    I’m agreeing with you in my first comment so I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your story about how they should follow her from a distant and stop her once she gets out is just fantasy.

      It’s reality in countries with police officers who had an actual education and training though. Let the “criminals” go for now, pick them up later. In this case, it would have saved two lives.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, when it’s deemed that approaching the criminal in public poses an imminent danger to the public.

        Or if they have reason to believe that the Alleged shoplifting is organized, They might hold of to later follow them home and conduct a search of the home for evidence of more stolen items.

        Are suggesting she’s either a danger to the public or part of organized shoplifting?

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or when approaching a SUSPECT (she wasn’t convicted of anything) causes danger to the suspect itself, for example.

          Let’s say that she is mentally ill, just to make the point. Are we going to do the same? Stand in front of the car, she gets a panic attack and just drives without thinking because of me tal illness. Are we going to shoot her too?

          Oh wait, that is what is happening all the time in the USA where innocent civilians with mental illnesses are murdered by police because police in the US isn’t trained to do their job right. This is actual realiti there.

          Again, had these police officers been trained properly, she (and her unborn baby) would still be alive today.

          This is not on her, this is on US police. Again.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The police should not have drawn weapons.

            She should not try to run them over. Not sure why that’s a controversial take for you.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, question: are you okay with police shooting the mentally ill when they’re having some episode? That, instead of controlling the situation and making sure that everyone gets out safely?

              And if you’re not, then why are you okay with them shooting a pregnant woman that likely got scared after they drew their weapons on her?

              • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Did I say i thought this whole thing was ok?

                Did I not explicitly say, multiple times. They shouldn’t have had weapons drawn?

                What you’re being caught up on. Is her choosing to run an officer down and then be like woah… they shot for that?

                This woman was for all we know. Sane. She would have known that if you try to run over a cop. They’re going to shoot you. Even if everything that lead up to that was the police mistake. She sealed her fate on her own with her last action. The police was wrong for handling the situation poorly. She was wrong for trying to run them over.

                Let me put it this way for you. Think this sums up my feelings towards the situation:

                I know that a semi-truck is supposed to, by law. Stop for me at a pedestrian crossing without lights. I have the right of way. That doesn’t mean I’m just gonna go for it without looking. Because I don’t want to die.

                Is it the trucks fault for plowing through a pedestrian crossing and not seeing me? Yes.

                Could I have also done something to prevent the situation? Yes.

                I would say it’s mostly my fault for not looking before crossing. Because I’m a fully functioning adult that knows i should look before crossing. I’m the one getting hurt by my own action.

                • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If I’m in a car and there is a guy standing with a gun drawn and pointed at me… I might get scared and flee. That is not crazy, that is human behaviour.

                  If a police officer is stupid enough to stand in front of a car it kinda shoes his education and training level. Non existent. That is the entire problem.

                  Blame this woman all you want. I don’t know of she stole from the store or not but it’s irrelevant. She was shot because she was suspected of shoplifting. The woman and these police officers made all this happen together. The only difference is that the police officers are supposed to know better, they are supposed to know how to do their job, how to deescalate and they didn’t.

                  The second they drew their guns they were wrong, they were escalating the situation. They could kmhave kept their guns holstered as they were in no danger. The girl got scared and wanted to run off. LET HER. you can catch her later, it’s not as if she was a criminal mastermind. She did not deserve to die because of this

                  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I really don’t have anything more to add. You can stop strawmanning this into oblivion with statements I’ve already said I agree with.

                    I never said she deserved to die. I never said they were right to draw weapons. So I’m not sure why you keep pushing those points. For the 8:th time now. I agree.

                    I blame the cops for escalating the situation. I blame the woman for her last action of trying to run them over.

                    Two wrongs does not make a right.

                    If you see it differently that’s ok. But don’t go putting words into my mouth I never once said or hinted at.