In a post regarding climate change I called another user an “Ignorant Slut” like that line from the Office. Anyways got permanently banned site wide and I just can’t help but wonder if that was necessary.

It’s not like I say that all the time, it was a one off instance and they just remove me from their site. I don’t mind it so much since it’s just a Reddit Account but it is really annoying since I can’t help but feel the admins had it out for me as they banned my account unjustly before and then reinstated it. But this time the ignorant slut was all the reason they needed to remove me from their existence.

Anyways just wanted to rant to the void on how dumb Reddit can be sometimes.

  • OasissisaO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You probably got banned because you referred to it as being from “The Office”, when it’s originally from “SNL”

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s similar to facebook or twitter at this point. You can get suspended for the most silly things, appeal it and they’re “NO we reviewed it and you are VERY bad” and meanwhile, someone can threaten to murder you and you report it, and they’re “we reviewed it and this was perfectly super cool, sorry”.

    • Dempf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The other thing is that they typically ban you for life, which is harsher even than our legal system. As a society we’ve agreed that it’s possible to pay your debt to society, but private companies have no obligation to see things that way. It’s like we’ve taken rules to deal with trolls in an old school Counter Strike server and tried to extend them to something that resembles a corporatocracy. It’s a lot different and more meaningful to get banned from service provided by a monopolistic company compared to getting banned from your local bar, for example, when you can just go across town to the other one.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t use that kind of insider joke on a social media. Chances are that at most 10% get it. The rest will be rightfully offended.

  • razdonovich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember getting banned off a subreddit simply because I subscribed to another subreddit that they didn’t approve of lol. When I tried to appeal, even un-subscribing from the other sub, they perma-banned me from the subreddit with no response. Good riddance.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I strongly suspect large numbers of trolls are making very, very heavy use of the reporting features.

  • loz@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was once suspended for making a dumb dick joke, something like “that guy must be hung” (it made sense in context, stupid sense, but sense nonetheless). This was reported as a threat of violence or whatever. I appealed, explaining that I wasn’t wishing anyone to be hanged, merely suggesting that they must have a large penis and got my account back.

    Meanwhile racist dogwhistles and rampant transphobia abound with little consequence.

  • kiddblur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you sure that’s what you got banned for? Like, did you get a message saying that’s why? I’ve literally never heard of someone getting site banned for mild name calling.

  • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So this was actually the second infraction on that account? And even if “ignorant slut” is a reference to something it seems like pretty strong language to me, especially if it’s an escalation from zero.