Elizabeth Hanna says she was fired by the American Diabetes Association after refusing to approve recipes heaped with the additive made by a major donor

Elizabeth Hanna had a simple job: help people with diabetes figure out what to eat. Anyone with common sense knows this should probably not entail foods that might increase people’s risk of getting diabetes. But that’s not necessarily the thinking at the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the world’s leading diabetes research and patient advocacy group, which also receives millions of dollars from sponsors in the pharmaceutical, food and agricultural industries.

According to a lawsuit Hanna recently filed against the ADA, the organization – which endorses recipes and food plans on its website and on the websites of “partner” food brands – tried to get her to greenlight recipes that she believed flew in the face of the ADA’s mission. These included recipes like a “cucumber and onion salad” made with a third of a cup of Splenda granulated artificial sweetener, “autumnal sheet-pan veggies” with a quarter cup of Splenda monk fruit sweetener and a “cranberry almond spinach salad” with a quarter cup of Splenda monkfruit sweetener.

Guess which company gave more than $1m to the ADA in 2022? Splenda.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Splenda is a low calories sweetener, the only reason a small package can say Zero Calories is just because of archaic FDA rule that some ingredients don’t have to be listed below 5 Grams which works as a sort of loophole for very small servings to not list things. There are 96 Calories and 24 carbs per Cup of Splenda.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Isn’t the whole point, at least for aspertame and other sweetners- I don’t know about Splenda; that they have a much stronger flavor so you use nowhere near as much

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No. Sweetness does not come from calories, it comes from the shape of the molecule as it touches the taste buds. Zero Calorie sweeteners do exist. Splenda is not one of them.

          People who shy away from sweets more often have a biological issue with high caloric content, such as diabetes or otherwise chronic weight gain caused by a type of Thyroid disorder. Some people simply prefer to stay at their current weight and avoid the health complications that come with high calories.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            No. Sweetness does not come from calories,

            Agreed.

            That wasn’t my point. My point was that where you would use a cup of sugar you’d use less Splenda than that, because it is sweeter. It is also lower calorie. Those are two compounding effects.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I answered your question, that’s not the point of using low or zero calorie sweeteners because volume has absolutely no correlation to calories or sweetness. Using less or more cups is meaningless in a discussion of their nutritional value.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It was poor rhetorical phrasing meant to emphasize it’s much sweeter than sugar, yes I know the point is also that they’re low calorie.

                Using less or more cups is meaningless in a discussion of their nutritional value.

                Well that’s not entirely true, extremely high doses of aspartame at least in rats was associated with cancer.