• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Probably, in the same way Steamboat Mickey is.

    Just part of the whole valuing property, in this case intellectual, over actual labor and people that our species loves so fucking much.

    Imagine if IP from drugs to technology to fiction had a 5-10 year max window before other people could work with and expand on it. It would be a better world for most.

    Oh you only get to make exclusive income on that thing you came up with for SEVERAL YEARS OF YOUR LIFE before you need to contribute in other ways to keep making money, boo fucking hoo. Where’s the sympathy for people working 2 jobs, burning their life up to meet basic needs, who don’t get several years of passive income on an idea that popped into their head 4 years ago.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Drugs do use patents with reasonable time limits.

      For some reason they are allowed to make miniscule changes and get new patents, but the old ways are then available for generics.

      It would be great if copyright switched back to reasonable time limits. Media companies would still live on as repositories that could sell access to high quality source copies and remasters to make income. They would only lose the control over other people using what is already in the public domain.

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly - the poor and working class are constantly told they need to evolve to keep up, why shouldn’t that apply to rich people too?