The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Thursday it would seek public opinion before finalizing its decision to remove a decongestant widely used in cough syrups from the agency’s list of ingredients for over-the-counter (OTC) use.

The FDA’s clarification follows a unanimous vote by its panel of outside experts on Tuesday against the effectiveness of oral OTC medicines made with phenylephrine, an ingredient widely used in cold and cough syrups.

If the FDA concurs with the panel’s view, it will first issue a proposed order removing phenylephrine from the list of ingredients that are allowed in OTC drugs, and seek public comment on it.

After considering the comments, if the FDA continues to conclude phenylephrine is not effective, the agency would issue a final order on it and work with manufacturers to reformulate products to effectively treat symptoms of cold or allergies.

  • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be clear, they’re trying to get rid of it because oral phenylephrine doesn’t work. It’s completely ineffective at being a decongestant.

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Phenylephrine is also linked to birth defects in pregnant women, while pseudoephedrine is not. My wife’s OB recommended sudafed when she had a cold. The pharmacy tech pointed her to the aisle with SudafedPE when she asked for Sudafed. So it’s ineffective and dangerous.

    • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I always (anecdotally) knew that this was just a cash grab by pharma companies to have “something” available without having to go to the pharmacy counter. It never worked for me, so I moved to other remedies if I ran out of psuedoepbedrine - steam, menthol, lemon/ginger/honey concoctions. All more effective for me.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh yeah get public opinion on scientifically tested facts. Dont wanna be making evidence based health decisions

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are they reporting it this way. The Administrative Procedures Act literally requires them to have a comment period on these executive rule changes.

    By the way, they seldom modify anything about the proposed actions even if the comments are overwhelmingly negative. Reference all the recent ATF “rule changes” that essentially amounted to executive fiat gun control. In those rule changes the comments were 90% negative and the positive comments were obviously astroturfed form letters, and they proceeded with the changes anyway.

  • HoustonHenry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As soon as I start coming down with something:

    1. Gargle warm salt water several times a day

    2. Use a Neti pot (or similar) several times a day

    I really don’t take much…except for dextromethorphan, but that’s just for fun