• StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not corporate FOSS that’s the problem here, it’s the BSD license. If BSD had a stronger license, Apple would be forced to give more back.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree it’s the BSD license. That’s what I mean. It’s a license that places no restriction on corporate use without contribution.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The BSD argument (that I don’t necessarily agree with) is that a less permissive license would encourage companies to use a different solution or build their own. I suppose this at least guarantees them a few $1000 a year depending on apple employee donations.