This is half a decade old news, but I only found this out myself after it accidentally came up in conversation at the DMV. The worker would not have informed me if it hadn’t come into conversation. Every DMV photo in the United States is being used for AI facial recognition, and nobody has talked about it for years. This is especially concerning given that citizens are recently being required to update their ID to a “Real ID,” which means more people than ever before are giving away the rights to their own face.

The biggest problem with privacy issues is that people talk about it for a while, but more often than not nothing ever happens to fix the problem, it simply gets forgotten. For example, in the next few years Copilot will simply become a part of people’s lives, and people will slowly stop talking about the privacy implications. What can we even do to fight the privacy practices of giants?

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You can be against it all you want but that doesn’t mean it’s going to matter IRL. The state of the world is that anyone with a large amount of data like this is using it to build models so they can profit and/or enforce. Even if they say they’re not doing it, they’re still doing it. Or someone with access to that data is doing it.

    Crying about the feds/DMV doing facial rec training is low hanging fruit. Obviously they’re going to be doing it along with every other government on the planet with the resources to do it. TBH there’s nothing inherently malicious about it, since them having the data they’re using is part of you having citizenship/identification in that country. The real malicious ones are the corporations contracted by said government to do the exact same thing except they’re doing their own data collection through huge networks of privately owned security cameras.

    The only way to avoid this is to go live in the woods and never come out. Any show of transparency or opting out of any of this would just be theater for you. It’s being done, has been done, and will be done without your consent or knowledge.

    • Nate Cox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      This attitude is what lets the government and big tech get away with so much bullshit.

      “Well it’s happening already so crying about it isn’t going to change anything because you know that protest has never ever been effective even once ever and I kinda like the taste of boot anyways so what’s the big deal?”

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yes, blame me for the sorry state of the world. It’s all my fault and the fault of people like me.

        I wish.

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not blaming you for the state of the world, I’m blaming you for taking your fatalist nonsense and using it to try to bring down others with you.

          • krolden@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not trying to bring anyone down I’m just trying to show them their efforts will most likely be futile in the end

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just because mass surveillance is already happening doesn’t mean we should accept it as our only option. While it’s true that governments and corporations are collecting data on us, there is still merit in pushing back against these practices. The point of privacy is not to hide everything and live in the woods, the point of privacy is to have control over what data you share, when you share it, and with whom you share it with. The problem isn’t facial recognition itself, the problem is living in the woods shouldn’t be the only way to avoid it. We should be able to opt out. What may seem fine to you is not always fine with others. That’s why threat models exist, after all.