• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love this graph because what it illustrates is that instead of going with the option that has virtually no waste, nuclear, everyone is fine with ramping up one that still is making a rather concerning amount of waste.

      Celebrating taking the second best option seems really dumb when the even better one is right there.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It wouldn’t show up because nuclear waste is beyond miniscule and nearly every atom is accounted for. No other industry can claim that.

              • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Please be polite instead of hostile .

                You’re also only looking at spent fuel quantity and not the reactor parts and tailings which constitute the bulk of radioactive waste.

                  • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Not really. Both solar and nuclear produce small amounts of waste compared with the fossil fuels industry. This makes them both reasonable choices from that perspective.

                    The problem with nuclear has always been cost.