• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those are great explanations of the differences between a law and theory.

    However an astute reader would have noticed that’s not actually the topic of discussion here. I shall posit my question again:

    Can you show that gravity is a theory and not a law?

    • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love the confidence with which you’re wrong and it’s clear that you’re trying very hard to sound smart but while I can explain this to you, and have more than once, I can’t understand it for you.

      Have a nice day.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re avoiding the question yet again, and now you’re resorting to sneering.

        Pathetic.

        • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Had you read, and more importantly understood, the two links I posted you could have answered your own question.

          You asked whether gravity was a law or a theory.

          Gravity is neither a law nor a theory. Gravity is a fundamental reaction that causes any object with mass to be attracted to any other object with mass.

          The law of gravity is a formula used to predict the effect of gravity.

          The theory of gravity is our collected knowledge on the subject of gravity and includes the law of gravity.

          So, the law of gravity is one small element of the theory of gravity.

          That is a complete and correct answer to your question.

          Now, unless you have a clear understanding of the difference between the idea of a theory in common parlance and the idea of a theory in science and how a law in science relates to a theory in science (which you would have if you had read and understood the two links I provided) you’re not going to understand this, despite my explaining it a third time, and you’re going to continue to argue with me instead of saying, “Oh! I get it now. Yes, I was wrong. Sorry, and thanks for the explanation.”

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gravity is neither a law nor a theory. …

            The law of gravity is …

            The theory of gravity is …

            So, it’s neither a law nor a theory, but also it’s both at the same time.

            This is getting a little ridiculous.