• wedleeneeber@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, and the “don’t touch me there, thats my no no square” programming I think is good, and productive.

    The issue I have is the ‘later’ grades education. For me (class of 2020) the latest education I received regarding sexual education was in fifth grade, where we were taught absolutely everything. All of the intercourses, all of the anatomy.

    There was no follow up, there was no peer to peer discussion, only adults telling us what the world was.

    My argument is not that we shouldn’t teach people all about sex and even sexual identities, only that we should teach them later in life, when people feel more confident in standing up to authority, and thinking for themselves.

    If a person is gay, lesbian, or trans, they will know, so why do they need to be educated by someone who likely knows less than them? (Aka adult teacher).

    Acceptance is a slightly different issue, just as we learn to not point at people with disabilities, all people should learn to not point at someone who cross dresses, and furthermore should try to befriend them, just as in the case of a disabled person

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like how you’re arbitrarily setting the line to which we all should believe and follow actual experts and where we should ignore them.

      Are there other areas where you know more than professionals with accreditation and decades of experience and are thus best to determine where the line is better than they can?