Hello everyone. I’m one of those rare sea birds that in 2023 still rides an i7 2600K OCd @ 4.8 GHz since launch day.

I’ve been poking and experimenting in and out of more recent computers but aside from the GPU upgrade, I haven’t really decided to let my i7 2600K retire.

It’s just that I can’t feel the “fastness” in new builds, however I honestly didn’t spend much time with a current gen high end machine.

Seeing as we are getting closer to yet another generation of AMD and Intel’s, do you guys think it will be worth it?

My full specs are: i7 2600K @ 4.8 GHz Gskill 32 GB 2133 CL10 DDR3 ASRock Z77 Extreme 6 (I swapped an Asus one year after when Z77 was released) 750W Corsair PSU 2x 500GB Raid0 Samsung Evo 2x 500GB Raid0 Crucial MX500 AMD 6750 XT along with a QHD 27" 165 Hz (started with an HD5870, then TO 380 now RX 6850XT)

  • sidewalker@thesidewalkends.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re not feeling the age of the chip for your own particular use cases (gaming, work, whatever) then I would wait until you do feel it. Put the money in an interest bearing account until you are ready.

    I’m on an i9 and in much the same boat, I could definitely upgrade, but nothing seems to be bogging down on CPU for me right now so I don’t feel the need. I will wait another generation or two and things will be ever better.

    • blacklionpt@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really is a tiny little trooper. I do mostly web development work, virtual machine based simulations before real world implementations and play some platformer games, and aside from the ocasional “ok 10 virtual machines is a bit too much” moments it chugs along great, before on Windows 10 LTSC and now since 1 and a half years ago on Debian with KDE (Steam Proton is really great!). I really have been saving, and I got to say, this PC has payed for itself almost 100 times over by now !

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you upgrade, it’s going to be big. You’ll need a new mobo and new RAM to go with that new CPU. Maybe get a faster SSD too since you’re currently running SATA.

    I was curious about the CPU, so I pulled some ratings from cpubenchmark.net

    i7 2600K @ 3.40GHz: 5478 / 1742

    i5 13600K @ 3.5 GHz: 38353 / 4176

    Ryzen 7700X @ 4.5GHz: 36351 / 4258

    If you plan to overclock any new CPU proportionally, then a CPU upgrade will give you an absolutely insane boost to multithreaded performance, and almost 2.5x the single-core performance. Honestly 2.5x doesn’t seem like a lot for a 12-year jump but it’s nothing to sneeze it either.

    If you’re not planning to overclock a new CPU like you did with your old one, and you’re dealing with mostly single-threaded workloads, then the difference won’t be so striking. Which is honestly surprising given how old that CPU is; it’s been a bad decade for single-thread performance, for sure, but I was still expecting a bigger difference.

    Personally, I upgraded recently from a Ryzen 1700 to a 7700X, and it’s a huge bump for me. I forget exactly what the numbers were, but my framerate and performance in Civ6 skyrocketed. Generally PC usage is noticeably faster; nothing revolutionary but certainly noticeable in web browsing and stuff like that.

    • blacklionpt@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I actually downloaded the software and ran it in my windows 11 dev drive, and it seems overclocking the CPU is quite the impact, netting me over 2000 points extra! To be fair i don’t know the reference speed at all, as i’ve had it overclocked since day one ! When i get a newer system i plan on overclocking, but from what i’ve been seeing overclocking a newer CPU doesn’t net as much juice as these old boys can do! That single core performance uplift should probably impact php/javascript quite a lot for my daily work, i will compare it when i finally pull the upgrade trigger!

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nice! That’s right in the range you’d expect given the overclock. 1742 / 3.4GHz * 4.8GHz = 2459, a bit above your result of 2336. And for multi, it’s 5478 / 3.4 * 4.8 = 7734, a bit below your results.

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It highly depends on what it is you’re doing. If all you do is play graphically intensive single player games at high settings, a 2600k can still be more than fast enough (especially when OC’d).

    As always with hardware upgrades, you need to find current issues, measure what causes them and upgrade that component. If there are no issues you’re aware of, there’s no need to upgrade IMHO.

    How high are FPS and GPU usage in your favourite games? If they’re rather low and GPU usage is <90%, you’re CPU bottlenecked and would likely see an increase in FPS.
    GPU usage roughly indicates the headroom; if you’re already close to 100% there likely is little point in upgrading because you’d be GPU-bottlenecked immediately after but if it’s, say, 50% you’d likely see a great increase in FPS. Then you’ll obviously have to ask yourself whether that increase is worth it. If you’re at >100fps already, the answer would probably be “no” for instance.

    Another factor to consider is power usage but I doubt a current-gen CPU would draw appreciably less power than a 2600K. I mean, it’s OC’d, so you’re probably in the neighbourhood of 120-150W I’d imagine but that’s not unheard of nowadays either and your GPU is likely a much larger factor.