And Hannah Montana is the lie of it being accessible to new players.
Where funny?
It’s… more… sexualized? What? Could you explain that part to me lmao
They just are old enough now to understand that paizo is a proud lgbt+ supporter and blame 2e
Kinda my thoughts but I wanted to see if it was actually just “PF2E bad because it’s canon is inclusive” or if there was something I was missing.
It’s a jab at players for being overly attached to the system. Basically that pf2 players are wearing rose colored glasses.
2e is weirder and more sexualized
My man did not play the same PF1e that I did.
Also, both games achieve different things. Neither is "better’, you just like 1e more, congrats.
This is a fever dream take lol
Touch grass
PF1 is 3X based and therefore unplayable garbage. PF2 is an actually functional game.
PF2e actually exists because of D&D 5e. 5e is a streamlined and (most people believe) improved version of 3.5, which is exactly what PF1e is under a different label. But to appeal to their rebellious hipster demographic the new PF had to be different and innovative. So you get a bunch of overly complex rules for options and the sake of just being like D&D but still totally not D&D. The result is a decent game that definitely isn’t 5e because it intentionally trades off most of the streamlining that makes 5e more approachable for the sake of complexity and options.
Basically it’s a bunch of pretentious hipster BS.
