• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Right, and the article makes it sound like a good thing that an SSO provider should be policing things. I see it as almost as bad as PayPal “policing” things against their moral code i.e. when they freeze funds for completely legal NSFW creators

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Right, and the article makes it sound like a good thing that an SSO provider should be policing things

      I’ve been very leery about the idea of letting companies own someone’s credentials via SSO in general, so if it encourages at least diversification away from a few SSO providers, I’m kind of enthusiastic about SSO providers imposing restrictions on people using their services.