The Supreme Court is taking up the case of an Ohio woman who claims she suffered sex discrimination in her employment because she is straight.

The justices on Friday agreed to review an appellate ruling that upheld the dismissal of the discrimination lawsuit filed by the woman, Marlean Ames, against the Ohio Department of Youth Services. Arguments probably will take place early next year.

Ames, who has worked for the department for 20 years, contends she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If she can demonstrate that she was denied a promotion or was demoted based on her sex or her orientation then she should win. Discrimination is against the law.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Although if she’s conflating her orientation class with her just being a fucking asshole she should lose.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Doesn’t really matter, either she can prove her case or she can’t. If she can’t, no one has to prove it was because she was an asshole.

          • andrewta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I disagree with your assessment. Just because someone can’t demonstrate something doesn’t mean it isn’t true. I’ll wait to see how it plays out.