• makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Blaming a privacy respecting app for a minority group is lame af. That’s how we lose all personal freedoms.

    Tewowists & paedophiles.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s how encrypted messagers work. Anyone can use then for any purpose. It is actually very reassuring that it has become so popular. Just to be clear I am not endorsing Neo Nazis.

    Also I like how Simplex Chat doesn’t have user facing identifiers. (People can’t DM you)

    The only concern I have is the public group chats but because I don’t use that feature it isn’t a big deal for me personally.

    • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      (People can’t DM you)

      This is false. However, you must generate an “identifier / group / channel” for them and share that link out-of-band to them." Basically it means nobody can slide into your DMs unless you yourself consent to it and forge a connection with them to do so. It does offer a way to invite other users to chat; but the other user must consent as well…which makes it far safer usually.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In other words, it’s the same effect as when you make separate identities to share with different contacts on any messaging service. SimpleX has adopted that as the normal way to operate.

        • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          They certainly make it easier to do so; by making it a switch you can toggle; which allows you to generate an identity; or choose not to and roll with the identity they’ve already seen.