• Adam@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t you know anything, Brits? Apple only strips security features for the Chinese government, you fools!

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s this publicly known, or just assumed because China blocks everything they can’t read?

      I assume that Apple gives the Chinese government access somehow, but I’ve never read details.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the links. Unfortunately, that NYT article does not make a single mention of iMessage or end-to-end encryption.

          Last I checked, iMessage still works in China. I find it implausible that China would allow this without access. If there’s a mechanism for that, I’d like to know what it is and how far it extends. The fact that Apple doesn’t admit that there’s a difference in iMessage’s security in China makes me wonder whether it is compromised globally.

          • Adam@geddit.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think there’s any evidence of a global compromise but I think you’re right that China wouldn’t allow access if it didn’t ultimately control it.

            I couldn’t find anything specific about iMessage but the keys are backed up to iCloud – and we know that’s compromised. I can’t imagine them leaving users the option to just not back up to iCloud to avoid surveillance, but I haven’t seen any specifics. Best to assume that under no circumstances do you ever have privacy from the gov’t in China or even when messaging someone in China.

      • Adam@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, they didn’t cave to Russia either. Apple just has principles until there’s enough cash on the table. Then they claim to “always abide by local laws” wherever they operate.

      • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, they are authoritarian enough. They just aren’t powerful enough.

        Want to know what it looks like to go power crazy with no power, then go look at the Tories.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it has more to do with where their factors are located. Hard to negotiate with the people who control the very land and people you utilize to build your hardware

        Not saying that justifies it, just think we should be accurate with our outrage

        • PooCrafter93@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I agree that the CCP have more leverage due to the factories, aa well as the larger user base.

          Just like to point out apple aren’t some altruistic organisation, they are a corporation out to make money, and that the CCP suck.

          Also, I profoundly disagree with the legislation this thread was originally about.

        • rbits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s more that they know they don’t have any negotiating power in China. China doesn’t care if they have iMessage, but the UK and the british people do.