• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People may disagree with how BlueSky is organized and architected, but I get why they decided to do what they did. User experience.

    Their architectural decisions mean that people don’t have to worry about instances confusing people, and the org structure means is easy to staff a proper dedicated experience team that can be working, planning, and testing before big expensive decisions are committed to code.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Bluesky is apart of the Fediverse and the quicker ActivityPub sites accommodate that fact the quicker we’ll have an open internet.

      This pissing fight between ActivityPub sites and Bluesky is dumb and doesn’t further an open internet.

      Not directed at you but to a lot, go put time into making Mastodon compatible with atProto instead of bitching.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Didn’t BlueSky come up with their own federation system because… Fuck you?

        I mean, what was wrong with using the ActivityPub standard?

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Filing as a B corp wouldn’t be my first choice if I was trying to prioritize getting rich.

        • wabafee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 minutes ago

          That is how it usually starts. It start innocent but the moment you see potential money or the funding runs out you either become like OpenAI, Google or go obscure worst bankruptcy. It does not help that their protocol is basically is how search engine works today. They control the flow of information and funded by venture capital.