• Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ve killed almost 1000 in Gaza now. Are you suggesting hamas shouldn’t ignore that? When does it end.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Either side giving up will be genocide. Or destroyed, which is again genocide.

        So essentially your idea of resolution is genocide.

            • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              WWII ended with one side surrendering. There was quite a lot of slaughter before that happened.

              • Lmaydev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Right but if one side surrenders here they’ll lose their land and be destroyed. They aren’t similar.

                If hamas get Israel the Jewish population is fucked. Look at what’s happening now when they crossed the border. That wasn’t war it was slaughter of civilians.

                If Israel get Gaza the Palestinian population is fucked. Look at the westbank. That is isn’t war either.

                It’s not the same as any war. It’s 100 years of religious / racial conflict.

                The only end is an agreement or genocide. And 100 years have shown an agreement is unlikely.

                They came over the border a killed 1000 civilians. In retaliation Israel has killed 1000 civilians in air strikes. It’s not war. It’s slaughter.