Summary

A teenage boy created and released three memecoins, earning over $50,000 by selling his holdings before the price crashed (“soft rug pull”).

The backlash was swift, with the boy and his family doxed and facing threats from angry traders.

While the legality of such actions is unclear, the incident highlights the risks and ethical dilemmas in the unregulated memecoin market.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    No, it’s just not backed by a commodity. That’s why it is currency by fiat. Company scrip is fiat currency and it’s not issued by any government.

    I get that you crypto fans don’t want your currency backed by nothing to be the same as all the other currencies backed by nothing except that, unlike crypto, nations actually support them and their citizens use them en masse, but that’s just the way things are.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      You’re just being obtuse. It does no good to argue about some obscure definition of the term, when that’s not how it’s being used.

      Company scrip can also be issued by a central authority.

      I think crypto is stupid, but so is your made up argument over terminology.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        It’s not an obscure definition.

        But fine, if the any government adopts crypto, like some people seem to want, it will be fiat currency.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I thought fiat currency has value because the authority says it does.

          Wouldn’t crypto have value based on the scarcity of new coins being mined, etc, regardless of what governments do with it?