• nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m saying without the greed of capitalism we wouldn’t have phones to swap out parts. We would have very limited technology because the incentive to innovate is much less when you do it because you want to rather than earning extra resources to raise standards of living(greed). Not as many people will volunteering their entire lives to come up with new technology while living the same standard of living as a farmer.

    • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I get what you’re saying but, respectfully, I think you’re incorrect. The field of science is not about capitalism but the goal of understanding everything around you. Aqueducts were not the result of capitalism. Russia won the space race. Innovations happen regardless. Capitalism drives innovation in specific directions.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Also id argue that the creation of the smartphone is the result of market forces, which arent unique to and predate Capitalism by millenia. The bronze age collapse happened largely due to the collapse of the grand trade networks and markets that birthed the bronze age, most bronze age societies predate currency as we understand it outright.

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m saying without the greed of capitalism we wouldn’t have phones to swap out parts.

      This might be a hot take but I’m not sure we all need a phone in our pocket or that it’s inherently a good thing.