It’s weird that you keep asking why I reply to people in kind when I’ve explicitly explained why repeatedly. I get offended when people sealion into my posts and make personal attacks against me. There’s no great mystery here.
I don’t feel the need to act mature or dignified with people I consider to be assholes. When somebody slides into my threads to call me a tankie, I have zero respect for that person. It’s that simple. I’m not the one creating the unhelpful dynamic, I just respond in kind to people who attack me because they don’t like the content of what I say.
Being more likeable and less glib can help, but none of us are perfect. My personal character flaw is that I don’t take it well when people attack me in this way.
I’m here to persuade people who are willing to have a civil discussion engaging with the topic of the post. You’ll find that I’m always civil talking to people who are civil in kind regardless of whether I agree with them or not.
So, when you see me post in certain communities you frequent, and you have a differing opinion then feel free to explain what you disagree on and have a discussion about it. Be the change you want to see in the world and all that.
You’re not using the term correctly. Or keep doing it wrong, up to you.
I understand that you’ve answered that you get to decide if a person is worthy of respect or dignity or decency. I find it highly ironic since you seem to exist on a part of the spectrum that would want those things for (almost?) everyone. That may not be true, but you seem inclined to push socialist ideas. I’m very open to that, personally. Many Americans are; the culture wars are used to distract and divide and it works.
If I’ve persisted in my question on why you become knee-jerk incivil, it’s because the answers so far have landed as “because.” Your most recent response hits more authentically and I appreciate it. I’ve sparred with trolls. I’ve sparred with those who genuinely disagree for good (and bad) reasons. Authentic, mature conversation appeals to me.
Dropping to name calling (emojis) based on the first reply on a thread lowers discourse. I’ll stop here. I just wish that shit didn’t happen so much.
I’m not your opponent but you sure set out that way when you correctly determined I’m in and from the US. The combativeness was not deserved, it was off-putting and I am much less likely to want to engage. Shrug.
It basically comes down to the paradox of tolerance. I don’t think it’s worth trying to have an actual discussion when people are trolling me which simply sucks up my time and validates what they’re doing.
Again, I didn’t determine you’re my opponent based on the fact that you’re from US. That seemed to be the case base on the derogatory personal attacks you made against me, such as calling me a tankie. That was off-putting to me, and hence why I didn’t see any point in trying to have a mature discussion. I’m perfectly happy to change my mind if you’re willing to have civil discourse as we’re having now.
It’s weird that you keep asking why I reply to people in kind when I’ve explicitly explained why repeatedly. I get offended when people sealion into my posts and make personal attacks against me. There’s no great mystery here.
I don’t feel the need to act mature or dignified with people I consider to be assholes. When somebody slides into my threads to call me a tankie, I have zero respect for that person. It’s that simple. I’m not the one creating the unhelpful dynamic, I just respond in kind to people who attack me because they don’t like the content of what I say.
Being more likeable and less glib can help, but none of us are perfect. My personal character flaw is that I don’t take it well when people attack me in this way.
I’m here to persuade people who are willing to have a civil discussion engaging with the topic of the post. You’ll find that I’m always civil talking to people who are civil in kind regardless of whether I agree with them or not.
So, when you see me post in certain communities you frequent, and you have a differing opinion then feel free to explain what you disagree on and have a discussion about it. Be the change you want to see in the world and all that.
You need to Google “sea lion troll.”
You’re not using the term correctly. Or keep doing it wrong, up to you.
I understand that you’ve answered that you get to decide if a person is worthy of respect or dignity or decency. I find it highly ironic since you seem to exist on a part of the spectrum that would want those things for (almost?) everyone. That may not be true, but you seem inclined to push socialist ideas. I’m very open to that, personally. Many Americans are; the culture wars are used to distract and divide and it works.
If I’ve persisted in my question on why you become knee-jerk incivil, it’s because the answers so far have landed as “because.” Your most recent response hits more authentically and I appreciate it. I’ve sparred with trolls. I’ve sparred with those who genuinely disagree for good (and bad) reasons. Authentic, mature conversation appeals to me.
Dropping to name calling (emojis) based on the first reply on a thread lowers discourse. I’ll stop here. I just wish that shit didn’t happen so much.
I’m not your opponent but you sure set out that way when you correctly determined I’m in and from the US. The combativeness was not deserved, it was off-putting and I am much less likely to want to engage. Shrug.
It basically comes down to the paradox of tolerance. I don’t think it’s worth trying to have an actual discussion when people are trolling me which simply sucks up my time and validates what they’re doing.
Again, I didn’t determine you’re my opponent based on the fact that you’re from US. That seemed to be the case base on the derogatory personal attacks you made against me, such as calling me a tankie. That was off-putting to me, and hence why I didn’t see any point in trying to have a mature discussion. I’m perfectly happy to change my mind if you’re willing to have civil discourse as we’re having now.