You know those sci-fi teleporters like in Star Trek where you disappear from one location then instantaneously reappear in another location? Do you trust that they are safe to use?

To fully understand my question, you need to understand the safety concerns regarding teleporters as explained in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQHBAdShgYI

spoiler

I wouldn’t, because the person that reappears aint me, its a fucking clone. Teleporters are murder machines. Star Trek is a silent massacre!

    • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stargate lore incorporates buffers holding your intermediate information, so it’s the same than Star Trek, actually.

    • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only if there is a DHD on both sides. I don’t want some in-house built crap that ignores the failsafes that the original builders put in place

      • Sheltac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even then, you have pretty much no way of knowing if there’s an iris. So it’s all fun and games until SLAM, all your atoms gets squished into metal.

      • penguin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The general idea is a teleporter rips you apart and the atoms go to the destination to be reassembled in the previous state.

        Whether or not it kills you is speculation. Arguably you’re pretty dead if you’re ripped apart atom by atom, and then a clone is assembled using the same parts.

        But I don’t think it’s answerable if the recreated “you” is a clone or not until people can figure out what the mind even is.

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Death is a state in which your biological functions cease. So no, it doesn’t kill you, since you function properly after.

              • penguin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you’d be fine with a scientist creating a perfect clone of you, and then killing you, letting the clone take your place?

                If it had the same memories.

                • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes. Since i would still be alive and have no memories of being killed. There’s no distinguishion between a perfect clone and me. Sorry if you don’t like a “you” only being memories.

              • superkret@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It doesn’t matter to anyone but you, since the clone is indistinguishable from you, but you’re still dead.

                  • superkret@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s what the debate is about, and there’s no way to know if “you” travel to the new body or get killed with the old.