Summary

AP reporter Josh Boak clashed with White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt over Trump’s tariff policy, which she called “a tax cut for the American people.”

Boak challenged her claim: “I’m sorry, have you ever paid a tariff? Because I have. They don’t get charged on foreign companies, they get charged on importers,” Boak said.

Leavitt accused him of questioning her economic knowledge and later regretted calling on AP.

The tense exchange highlights ongoing White House-AP tensions, as a federal judge prepares to hear AP’s legal challenge over press access on March 20.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    keep in mind…anyone chosen to speak for the administration…they have been chosen specifically because they have no idea what they are talking about.

    this makes it much easier for them to tell a convincing lie (as they are only repeating what they are told)…and allows the administration to deny culpability if the are caught.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Leavitt accused him of questioning her economic knowledge

    Which is none. Her degree is in communications and politics which she got while riding a softball scholarship. She was a press writer for Trump’s first term, worked as a communications director for Elise Stefanik during the interim, and now she is Press Secretary. None of that is fucking economics. She has zero fucking knowledge of how fucking economics works, that’s just stating fucking fact. When it comes to economics she is a fucking idiot.

    It’s not even a fucking question. Josh Boak has worked in DC economics reporting since 2013, he literally has more economic knowledge in his left pinky fingernail than that stupid fuckface has in her entire fucking life. That is just FACT.

    later regretted calling on AP

    Because she is a thin skinned bitch. She absolutely cannot stand that people could possibly know MORE than her dumb fucking softball is about as good as it is ever going to get for her, ass could ever know. She’s just a fucking idiot, that’s all there is to it.

    Yes you fucking idiot, yes, Boak knows more by measures larger than stellar bodies are measured, about economics than you. For a White House that gets up in arms about DEI hires, holy shit I dare someone to explain her dumbass.

    • Kane@femboys.biz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This context is so important!

      When called out on your lies, and you are unable to prove otherwise, you should concede your argument. But I suppose the point wasn’t to be truthful.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s beating around the bush too much for me. I’m not reading politics for the fees fees or “slams”. I’m here because it’s a moral and ethical duty to stay informed. If I want to be entertainment I stop paying attention.

        She is not an idiot. She knows exactly what she’s doing. Every time one of these fascist ghouls spouts dogshit, their lies and propaganda need to be explicitly highlighted with extreme candor, by everyone.

        This isn’t “questioning her knowledge of economics”. It wouldn’t matter if she had an economics PHD on tariffs. She is spouting a state propaganda LIE that is identical to the lies of Russian state media. Her knowledge is irrelevant. She knows she’s lying. We know she’s lying. Nothing else matters. Her intentions are to lie and deceive. She is a fascist cuntrag, and when their dictatorship arrives at its logical conclusion, she should be tried and hung in the Hague like the rest of them.

        She is aiding a fascist coup. Never forget that.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In summary, no one is questioning her economic knowledge because she has none. Just as no one would ever question her ability to feel shame or empathy.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think it’s funny not in the “dumb blonde” way, but the “Trump prefers blondes, so DEI hires will be young attractive blonde white women now” way.

          At least they are not hiring kids for the same reason.

          • NotSerious@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Trump is a simple man. Maybe it was never about fucking kids. Maybe it was always about fucking Ivanka. This lady appears to be same age as Ivanka. I know she’s not; but she looks haggard enough to be her age. And it’s all about looking like Ivanka, not about being a kid or being the actual age of Ivanka.

            He told Katie Johnson she reminded him of Ivanka. And then he raped her.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I get it, but shacking up with grown women 30 years younger is just sad in a way that he was unable to find someone who would love him in all his life as he views women as possessions.

              Raping kids on the other hand is one of the lowliest crimes both legally and morally.

  • PointyReality@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Man people are dumb, for those that still think this is a good idea here is the logic. Tariffs increase the price to bring in goods to a country, the supplier will typically add this additional price increase and charge it back onto the buyer to absorb. Meaning the buyer will see an increase.

    Now let’s say Trump is doing this to bring production back to the States, in order to be successful you need to keep costs down as low as possible. This is also the reason alot of countries sent their production overseas because it’s cheaper (wages for example). So in order for the US to even begin competing with production giants like China and keep costs down means workers in the US have to get used to the idea of China style wages and work conditions. Hence Trumps reasoning for giving more power back to companies so that in X years US becomes the new production hub. But the pain to get there is going to be astronomical for the US. Feel free to add or point out any illogical thought processes in my opinion.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The same people saying we can’t raise the minimum wage cuz it will raise the cost of goods are somehow unable to understand this.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Mind you, bringing production back to the US will never lower costs, completely regardless of the fact that labor and environmental compliance is more costly. All tariffs do is set a price floor for imported products that domestic supplies now only have to match.

  • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The other day my mom asked me “wouldn’t you rather pay tariffs than income taxes?” I’m in the bottom percent of tax payers and she’s even worse off. I still haven’t responded.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I now regret letting a real reporter show how stupid I am, and how stupid I think the American people are.”- Dumb Reich Barbie.