vettnerk@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agowhich linux distro do you NOT like, and why?message-squaremessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1message-squarewhich linux distro do you NOT like, and why?vettnerk@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squarecircuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo what you’re actually saying is: you don’t like Arch because you don’t want to take the time to learn how to use Arch. (Which is fine)
minus-squareJebanuusPisusII@szmer.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoJust use Arch in a Distrobox on Fedora or openSUSE. That’s the best of both worlds.
minus-squarenik282000@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah, that’s pretty much it. I don’t want to use a kit/show car for commuting.
minus-squarecircuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoFair. Though I will say (more for others who may see this in the future), that Arch’s new installer is great and definitely reduces the load on new users. That said, it’s never going to be explicitly designed for people who have no Linux experience.
So what you’re actually saying is: you don’t like Arch because you don’t want to take the time to learn how to use Arch.
(Which is fine)
Just use Arch in a Distrobox on Fedora or openSUSE. That’s the best of both worlds.
Yeah, that’s pretty much it. I don’t want to use a kit/show car for commuting.
Fair. Though I will say (more for others who may see this in the future), that Arch’s new installer is great and definitely reduces the load on new users. That said, it’s never going to be explicitly designed for people who have no Linux experience.