Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think you understand what plagiarism is. When you profit off of someone else’s work, you’re plagiarizing. Libraries do not profit off of anything. OpenAI, however, is a for-profit endeavor.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      plagiarizing

      This is taking someone’s work and passing it off as your own. Did you not do a simple google search when there was some doubt to the definition, like I just did?

        • joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Did you read that?

          Plagiarism can happen intentionally or unintentionally when a person uses another person’s ideas or words without citing the original source. Here are four common forms of plagiarism:

          • Copying another person’s words without using quotation marks or referencing the original source
          • Copying an author’s words without using quotation marks but using accurate footnotes to the original source
          • Paraphrasing an author’s ideas without including a reference to the original source
          • Rearranging an author’s exact words, even if there is a footnote to the original source

          Oh no, I plagiarized! lol

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Copying another person’s words without using quotation marks or referencing the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

            Copying an author’s words without using quotation marks but using accurate footnotes to the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

            Paraphrasing an author’s ideas without including a reference to the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

            Rearranging an author’s exact words, even if there is a footnote to the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, can. It is capable of doing all those things and, again, if she is correct, will do so if prompted.

                • joe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think this is nonsense, but you’re saying the issue is that it doesn’t use quotes when someone asks it to quote a passage from her book? Is that true?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nope, again, the issue is that it can regurgitate the entire book if prompted. Why you think that’s legal is beyond me. What if it had video. Should it be allowed to spit out all of Oppenheimer if prompted?