• danhakimi@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To hear people on the privacy subreddits and even the privacy Lemmy communities tell it, it’s absolutely about the data these companies are collecting.

    Sure. But I can’t blame them for collecting data that I literally decide to send them for no reason but my own, I can only blame them for using that data in a shitty way.

    If I post something on Instagram, I know that they’re collecting the photo I post, that’s how posting works, that’s not the issue. The issue comes if they try scanning peoples’ faces to invade their privacy, or build an advertising profile about me. Sending unencrypted chat messages is not that different.

    If I download Whatsapp, and I enable the contacts permission, and it uploads all of the Contacts data on my phone, that’s super not okay, because I never wanted to give them that data in the first place, they just jacked it.(I disable contacts permission for whatsapp on my phone, but most users would never know that data gets uploaded to begin with.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Users are responsible for the conduct and permissions they give to companies. Absolving them of that responsibility doesn’t make sense ethically or legally. We can’t just say “they didn’t know because WhatsApp didn’t tell them”. That’s not really an accurate statement. They more than likely agreed to use the app and in exchange they would receive free use and WhatsApp would receive that data. But they more than likely didn’t read the agreement before agreeing. That’s on them.

      • danhakimi@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But not in the same way that it’s on them if they don’t know that when they post a post to facebook, facebook has the post.

        one of these things is sheer vapid stupidity, one of them is a failure of extreme vigilance in a modern nightmare society.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can make a private group on Facebook where you can exchange messages without anyone who lacks system access being able to view them. That’s how CP rings hide what they’re doing. And Facebook allows it until someone reports it or the cops subpoena that data. Which is basically the same as every other messaging platform or social media site that allows such functionality. So what was it you wanted them (Facebook, or WhatsApp, or signal or telegram) to do? Delete the accounts or known terrorists whether they are or aren’t using the platform for terrorist activities? Because I don’t really understand what you’re advocating for. You appear to very much be advocating for people’s private messages to be scanned and possibly read by a human being if they trip the algorithm. So yes. You are advocating for an invasion of privacy.