Access options:
Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn’t going to do that.
Access options:
Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn’t going to do that.
real estate development probably, if you think about whats going on in gaza, he wants to do the same there, build properties on untainted lands.
So what you’re saying is that he isn’t using the trees to build properties, but using the land after the trees has been cut to build property. I can’t imagine this would fly legally for national forests though.