• Riccosuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What a stupid fucking argument. Gun violence is a sheer numbers game. The ease of access and use of firearms is a massive problem, and when you combine that with the serious socio-economic/political problems in this country that is how you end up with this on-going violence.

    Yeah, there are other ways for people to commit violence such as the examples you provided, but they aren’t used at the same scale or with the same frequency. Why? Well, partly because building a bomb is a lot more complicated than buying a gun. Does it still happen? Yes, but again with FAR less frequency.

    Your argument that because there are other ways to commit violence that we should not do anything to combat gun violence is just so tired and misguided. We should do something where we can to combat problems that we know how to deal with. It isn’t a fucking mystery how you limit gun violence. You need to limit the number of guns.

    Look at smoking as an example. Everyone knows that smoking causes cancer now. There are still people who choose to smoke, but it has become much less prominent thanks to social enforcement of not smoking in public places among other things. It took a generation, but millions of lives have been saved thanks to the slow roll of common sense limitations and restrictions on tobacco products.

    Quit using these fallacious arguments, and just say what you really mean:

    “I don’t personally care about people who die to gun violence because my personal desire to continue owning guns supercedes the need for any common sense gun reforms.”

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What gun control would stop this? 95% of our violence via guns is from handguns. 85+% is drug and gang related, 2/3rds is suicides. Shootings like this are a rounding error in the 40k a year deaths, and when compared to the police killing 1k~ a year (yes 1 in 40 of those 40k is from the police) shootings like this aren’t an issue. They just get views because they cause more carnage. An AWB and background checks won’t stop this. Our society is breaking down and it’s not the firearms that are the root cause.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        shootings like this aren’t an issue.

        And yet they happen in the U.S. far more than any other Western country. Which sounds like an issue.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Stop putting words into my mouth.

        First of all, make me.

        Second of all, I only put the words there that you were too disingenuous to utter yourself because you would rather use fallacious arguments than to own your position outright.

        argue against the ones I’m actually saying you stupid shit.

        I did that too, but you didn’t want to engage with that. I think that says a lot about the quality (or lack there of) in your arguments.

        Do you think shooting up a public place is the action of a rational, sane individual?

        No.

        Do you think that maybe, just maybe, this country’s healthcare system, especially it’s mental healthcare, could maybe use some improvement?

        Yes.

        Do you think that the rights of innocent, sane individuals should be violated just because someone else unrelated to them committed a crime?

        This is a bad argument. I never said “ban guns” because I know that is never going to happen in this country. However, I am also aware there are other ways to combat the problem like mandatory registration, increasing the age to buy firearms, better red flag laws, and many other enforcement options.

        I’m sorry you don’t like the truth, but the truth is that our existing regulations would work just fine if we actually had a functioning healthcare system that could, I dunno, maybe help these people before they go off the deep end. Crazy, I know.

        Two things can need improvement at the same time. We can have better gun laws, and better healthcare. They are not mutually exclusive. Only knuckle-dragging half-wits think these problems aren’t interrelated, and therefore a multi-pronged approach to solving them would obviously be necessary.

        Then again, maybe you’d prefer another Oklahoma City instead.

        More fallacious argumentation from you. What a surprise. This doesn’t even justify engaging with.

        • Ikenshini@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          These are really great ideas. If only we had manditory registration, a high age restriction for guns (why not 35? That’s the same age you have to be president right?), and really strong red flag laws (seems like we need to take the guns from people in the military, they don’t seem to be fit to have guns), there’s a chance this shooting wouldn’t have happened.

        • archonet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, so now you claim to read minds. Ok. Not reading the rest of this drivel, it’s clear you’re not really up to this. Better luck next time, champ!

      • Montagge@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sane yes
        Rational no
        You just want these shooters to be mentally ill so they’re one of the lesser people. It’s sad.