For once it would be nice for crypto bigots to actually have their own ideas instead of parroting ridiculously wrong meme talking points
When was the last time the Average Joe had a problem with illegal subletting or a complicated discovery process?
There are tons of processes that the ‘average joe’ isn’t aware of that affects their life. Illegal subletting drives up rent prices and causes fire hazards (that affects EVERYONE), I have had friends who rented an illegal sublet without realizing it and were thrown out by the original owner.
Illegal subletting is a big enough problem in my state that the state has a literal funded task force to address it. If everyone adopted NFTs as ownership marks, this task force would be largely unneeded.
Also: you are cherry picking like a mofo
The NFT IS a contract
No, it is not.
Yes, it is, as all parties can clearly be identified, the document cannot be altered after creation without the participation of both parties, and is a matter of public historic record.
The PROBLEM is you think that I’m talking about copyright law, which is what 90% of the blog posts on NFT contract legality covers, and I’m not at all but property law.
More importantly, though, if crypto advocates’ claims are valid, then it shouldn’t matter whether a smart contract is a legal contract.
This sentence alone has convinced me you really don’t have any clue what you are talking about, and you are just using every meme you know to create a firehose of lies to protect your fragile ego.
Just accept you made the wrong choice about crypto based on some funny memes and zero understanding.
For once it would be nice for crypto bigots to actually have their own ideas instead of parroting ridiculously wrong meme talking points
There are tons of processes that the ‘average joe’ isn’t aware of that affects their life. Illegal subletting drives up rent prices and causes fire hazards (that affects EVERYONE), I have had friends who rented an illegal sublet without realizing it and were thrown out by the original owner.
Illegal subletting is a big enough problem in my state that the state has a literal funded task force to address it. If everyone adopted NFTs as ownership marks, this task force would be largely unneeded.
Also: you are cherry picking like a mofo
Yes, it is, as all parties can clearly be identified, the document cannot be altered after creation without the participation of both parties, and is a matter of public historic record.
The PROBLEM is you think that I’m talking about copyright law, which is what 90% of the blog posts on NFT contract legality covers, and I’m not at all but property law.
This sentence alone has convinced me you really don’t have any clue what you are talking about, and you are just using every meme you know to create a firehose of lies to protect your fragile ego.
Just accept you made the wrong choice about crypto based on some funny memes and zero understanding.